WWT Shows CLICK TO: Join and Support Internet Horology Club 185™ IHC185™ Forums

• Check Out Our... •
• TWO Book Offer! •
Go
New Topic
Find-Or-Search
Notify
Tools
Reply to Post
  
18s Dial Question "Click" to Login or Register 
IHC Member 1016
posted
I have a 937 coming and it has an incorrect dial. One person suggested that it should have a DS dial with RN, and a RR track around it. My question is whether ANY DS early "Hamilton watch Co." 18s dial is appropriate, or is it specifically the RN RR track type? This is a 4 digit SN 937 movement. I have not actually seen the watch at this point.

In looking at Buster's response to Gene Buffard's request for a dial on his 954, I notice that the add says any 16s dial will fit. It seems that since the dial was an aftermarket choice at the jeweler, it should not be a big concern. As always, opinions are sought, good or bad!

 
Posts: 3112 | Location: Klamath Falls, Oregon in the USA | Registered: October 13, 2007
IHC Member 1291
Picture of Buster Beck
posted
Yes, that's "964" Mike that I talked with Gene about. And yes any dial could be had on his watch.

As to your early 937, any "Hamilton Watch Co." signature dial would be appropriate.

However........ Big Grin

I would suggest that any of the watches that had a minimum of 17J and were adjusted to 5 Positions such as Gene's 964 O/F, and including your 937 H/C

To have a DSD fronting them as most of them "came" that way from the factory when a movement/dial/hands went out unless a "special order" for a seconds sunk only came in or when a movement only went out.

As to RN or AN on your early watch, use whatever you wish as both were in vogue.

Here are some 18sz. Hamilton Grades and Adjustments;

 
Posts: 6376 | Location: Texas in the USA | Registered: July 27, 2009
IHC Member 1291
Picture of Buster Beck
posted
Here are some 16sz. Hamilton Grades and Adjustments;

 
Posts: 6376 | Location: Texas in the USA | Registered: July 27, 2009
IHC Member 1291
Picture of Buster Beck
posted
Here are some watch requirements from Sept. 1, 1921 published in The Santa-Fe Magazine;

 
Posts: 6376 | Location: Texas in the USA | Registered: July 27, 2009
IHC Member 1291
Picture of Buster Beck
posted
As you can see even as late as 1921, watches could be "grandfathered" in and watch inspectors did have some leeway BUT the watches still had to perform or live up to the set standards for timekeeping.

regards,
bb
 
Posts: 6376 | Location: Texas in the USA | Registered: July 27, 2009
IHC Member 1016
posted
Thanks Buster. Your knowledge is a real help. I wish I could learn what you forgot!
 
Posts: 3112 | Location: Klamath Falls, Oregon in the USA | Registered: October 13, 2007
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


©2002-2023 Internet Horology Club 185™ - Lindell V. Riddle President - All Rights Reserved Worldwide

Internet Horology Club 185™ is the "Family-Friendly" place for Watch and Clock Collectors