WWT Shows | CLICK TO: Join and Support Internet Horology Club 185™ | IHC185™ Forums |
![]() |
• Check Out Our... • • TWO Book Offer! • |
Go ![]() | New Topic ![]() | Find-Or-Search ![]() | Notify ![]() | Tools ![]() | Reply to Post ![]() | ![]() |
I have a Hamilton 16s 3-foot Canadian, Montgomery dial. I have some of the "diamond" tipped hands which I've seen on the later, bolder dials. I was wondering if there was a more delecate version of those hand which went with this style dial, or were spade hand appropriate. Thanks for any input. best,Kevin | |||
|
IHC Member 1291![]() |
Probably need a set of Hamilton 24 hour hands to go with the Hamilton 12/24 hour DSD. regards, bb ![]() | |||
|
Buster, I do have a set of that style hand. My real quandry is that it looks too massive for the size of numbers on my (earlier) dial. Are you aware of a slimmer version of your hands?? best, Kevin | ||||
|
IHC Member 1291![]() |
Why not try them on your dial, and shoot a pic so the members can give a Yea/Nay to help with your quandary ?? regards, bb | |||
|
Here's the combo, in all it's raging glory. ![]() | ||||
|
IHC Member 1541![]() |
Kevin, I have exactly the same dial and hands as Buster but honestly think those hands look better on your dial than ours. Here is a pic of a dial with the shorter hour hand with the afternoon numbers in the centre chapter. A bit better fit than mine or Buster's I would say ![]() | |||
|
IHC Member 1541![]() |
While this is a Rockford dial, not Hamilton, it is almost the same as yours and looks good with the light spade hands. | |||
|
IHC Member 1541![]() |
Buster, while the same, there are differences in our dials. The 10 on yours is clipped and the afternoon numbers font is different. Mine is a 992 #1537307 1920 What are your digits | |||
|
Lorne,,thanks for your kind comments and photos. I was thinking the hands in your first post look like the ones used on the Ferguson dials. Here's a dial in a 992, no175527 `1923 | ||||
|
IHC Member 1291![]() |
I say "Yea" as those hands on your dial Kevin look like a marriage from Heaven. [Those hands & dial I ran come from a 2009 post and don't belong to me]. Perhaps others will offer their opinion as well. regards, bb | |||
|
IHC Member 1541![]() |
Yes they sure do look like Ferguson hands, I need a set of those. | |||
|
IHC Member 1357 |
Kevin,I would go with that combination.It is not cluttered looking. Looking good!! Roger | |||
|
IHC Member 1892 |
Kevin: I like your combo. I think those 12/24 dials look better with a substantial set of hands vs the smaller spade hands. Gives a more balanced look. | |||
|
IHC Life Member ![]() |
Kevin, that looks like a perfect fit to me. I bet there are many who wish they had a set of those 24 hour hands. They look great with that dial! ![]() Regards, Larry | |||
|
Thanks to everyone who chipped in. I will go with your opinions. I'm thinking of installing the dial on a 952 (not currently accessible) if the production date fits in with a script signed dial. best, Kevin | ||||
|
IHC Life Member ![]() |
They started making the Hamilton 952, both pendent and lever set, in 1909 and went to 1924. The script dial like yours went till 1918, so there should be a good chance that it will work Kevin. Regards, Larry | |||
|
Those diamond hands are shown in Hamilton material catalogs from the 1920s and are called "24 Hour" and are absolutely correct for those Canadian dials. | ||||
|
Here's the puppy with dial/hands installed. Thanks again to all. | ||||
|
IHC Member 1357 |
Looking good,Kevin ![]() Roger | |||
|
IHC Life Member ![]() |
You mean like this one? ![]() | |||
|
IHC Member 1610![]() |
Good choice Kevin! | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
![]() | Your request is being processed... |
|