WWT Shows CLICK TO: Join and Support Internet Horology Club 185™ IHC185™ Forums

• Check Out Our... •
• TWO Book Offer! •
Go
New Topic
Find-Or-Search
Notify
Tools
Reply to Post
  
Hamilton Canadian dial/hand combinations "Click" to Login or Register 
posted
I have a Hamilton 16s 3-foot Canadian, Montgomery dial. I have some of the "diamond" tipped hands which I've seen on the later, bolder dials. I was wondering if there was a more delecate version of those hand which went with this style dial, or were spade hand appropriate. Thanks for any input.

best,Kevin

 
Posts: 486 | Location: Arizona in the USA | Registered: March 13, 2010
IHC Member 1291
Picture of Buster Beck
posted
Probably need a set of Hamilton 24 hour hands to go with the Hamilton 12/24 hour DSD.

regards,
bb

 
Posts: 6376 | Location: Texas in the USA | Registered: July 27, 2009
posted
Buster,

I do have a set of that style hand. My real quandry is that it looks too massive for the size of numbers on my (earlier) dial. Are you aware of a slimmer version of your hands??

best, Kevin
 
Posts: 486 | Location: Arizona in the USA | Registered: March 13, 2010
IHC Member 1291
Picture of Buster Beck
posted
Why not try them on your dial, and shoot a pic so the members can give a Yea/Nay to help with your quandary ??

regards,
bb
 
Posts: 6376 | Location: Texas in the USA | Registered: July 27, 2009
posted
Here's the combo, in all it's raging glory.

 
Posts: 486 | Location: Arizona in the USA | Registered: March 13, 2010
IHC Member 1541
Picture of Lorne Wasylishen
posted
Kevin, I have exactly the same dial and hands as Buster but honestly think those hands look better on your dial than ours.

Here is a pic of a dial with the shorter hour hand with the afternoon numbers in the centre chapter.

A bit better fit than mine or Buster's I would say

 
Posts: 2093 | Location: British Columbia in Canada | Registered: March 02, 2011
IHC Member 1541
Picture of Lorne Wasylishen
posted
While this is a Rockford dial, not Hamilton, it is almost the same as yours and looks good with the light spade hands.

 
Posts: 2093 | Location: British Columbia in Canada | Registered: March 02, 2011
IHC Member 1541
Picture of Lorne Wasylishen
posted
Buster, while the same, there are differences in our dials.

The 10 on yours is clipped and the afternoon numbers font is different.

Mine is a 992 #1537307 1920

What are your digits

 
Posts: 2093 | Location: British Columbia in Canada | Registered: March 02, 2011
posted
Lorne,,thanks for your kind comments and photos. I was thinking the hands in your first post look like the ones used on the Ferguson dials.

Here's a dial in a 992, no175527 `1923

 
Posts: 486 | Location: Arizona in the USA | Registered: March 13, 2010
IHC Member 1291
Picture of Buster Beck
posted
I say "Yea" as those hands on your dial Kevin look like a marriage from Heaven.

[Those hands & dial I ran come from a 2009 post and don't belong to me].

Perhaps others will offer their opinion as well.

regards,
bb
 
Posts: 6376 | Location: Texas in the USA | Registered: July 27, 2009
IHC Member 1541
Picture of Lorne Wasylishen
posted
Yes they sure do look like Ferguson hands, I need a set of those.
 
Posts: 2093 | Location: British Columbia in Canada | Registered: March 02, 2011
IHC Member 1357
posted
Kevin,I would go with that combination.It is not cluttered looking. Looking good!!
Roger
 
Posts: 4094 | Location: Carbon, Texas in the USA | Registered: January 24, 2010
IHC Member 1892
posted
Kevin: I like your combo. I think those 12/24 dials look better with a substantial set of hands vs the smaller spade hands. Gives a more balanced look.
 
Posts: 361 | Location: Kincardine, Ontario in Canada | Registered: November 25, 2013
IHC Life Member
Picture of Larry Lamphier
posted
Kevin, that looks like a perfect fit to me. I bet there are many who wish they had a set of those 24 hour hands. They look great with that dial! Smile

Regards,
Larry
 
Posts: 2733 | Location: Northeastern United States | Registered: February 28, 2010
posted
Thanks to everyone who chipped in.
I will go with your opinions. I'm thinking of installing the dial on a 952 (not currently accessible) if the production date fits in with a script signed dial.

best,
Kevin
 
Posts: 486 | Location: Arizona in the USA | Registered: March 13, 2010
IHC Life Member
Picture of Larry Lamphier
posted
They started making the Hamilton 952, both pendent and lever set, in 1909 and went to 1924. The script dial like yours went till 1918, so there should be a good chance that it will work Kevin.

Regards,
Larry
 
Posts: 2733 | Location: Northeastern United States | Registered: February 28, 2010
posted
Those diamond hands are shown in Hamilton material catalogs from the 1920s and are called "24 Hour" and are absolutely correct for those Canadian dials.
 
Posts: 653 | Location: St Paul, Minnesota in the USA | Registered: May 04, 2004
posted
Here's the puppy with dial/hands installed. Thanks again to all.

 
Posts: 486 | Location: Arizona in the USA | Registered: March 13, 2010
IHC Member 1357
posted
Looking good,Kevin Wink
Roger
 
Posts: 4094 | Location: Carbon, Texas in the USA | Registered: January 24, 2010
IHC Life Member
Picture of Larry Lamphier
posted
You mean like this one? Smile

 
Posts: 2733 | Location: Northeastern United States | Registered: February 28, 2010
IHC Member 1610
Picture of Harry J. Hyaduck Sr.
posted
Good choice Kevin!
 
Posts: 3858 | Location: Georgia in the USA | Registered: September 22, 2011
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


©2002-2023 Internet Horology Club 185™ - Lindell V. Riddle President - All Rights Reserved Worldwide

Internet Horology Club 185™ is the "Family-Friendly" place for Watch and Clock Collectors