I have a Hamilton 16s 3-foot Canadian, Montgomery dial. I have some of the "diamond" tipped hands which I've seen on the later, bolder dials. I was wondering if there was a more delecate version of those hand which went with this style dial, or were spade hand appropriate. Thanks for any input.
best,Kevin
Posts: 486 | Location: Arizona in the USA | Registered: March 13, 2010
I do have a set of that style hand. My real quandry is that it looks too massive for the size of numbers on my (earlier) dial. Are you aware of a slimmer version of your hands??
best, Kevin
Posts: 486 | Location: Arizona in the USA | Registered: March 13, 2010
Kevin: I like your combo. I think those 12/24 dials look better with a substantial set of hands vs the smaller spade hands. Gives a more balanced look.
Posts: 361 | Location: Kincardine, Ontario in Canada | Registered: November 25, 2013
Thanks to everyone who chipped in. I will go with your opinions. I'm thinking of installing the dial on a 952 (not currently accessible) if the production date fits in with a script signed dial.
best, Kevin
Posts: 486 | Location: Arizona in the USA | Registered: March 13, 2010
They started making the Hamilton 952, both pendent and lever set, in 1909 and went to 1924. The script dial like yours went till 1918, so there should be a good chance that it will work Kevin.
Regards, Larry
Posts: 2733 | Location: Northeastern United States | Registered: February 28, 2010
Those diamond hands are shown in Hamilton material catalogs from the 1920s and are called "24 Hour" and are absolutely correct for those Canadian dials.
Posts: 653 | Location: St Paul, Minnesota in the USA | Registered: May 04, 2004