WWT Shows CLICK TO: Join and Support Internet Horology Club 185™ IHC185™ Forums

• Check Out Our... •
• TWO Book Offer! •
Go
New Topic
Find-Or-Search
Notify
Tools
Reply to Post
  
Illinois watch aficionados what do you think? "Click" to Login or Register 
posted
I have a 60 hr Bunn that is in a model one case but marked 29. Could this be a factory error? Would like to hear your opinions. All numbers match so it isnt a a wrong back.

 
Posts: 91 | Location: Indiana in the USA | Registered: September 09, 2015
posted
Clearly marked m9del 29 in correct font

 
Posts: 91 | Location: Indiana in the USA | Registered: September 09, 2015
posted
4

front
 
Posts: 91 | Location: Indiana in the USA | Registered: September 09, 2015
posted
Top view

crown
 
Posts: 91 | Location: Indiana in the USA | Registered: September 09, 2015
IHC Member 1541
Picture of Lorne Wasylishen
posted
You pretty well have to go with factory error but hopefully Buster will chime in with his vast knowledge.

In the meantime here is a good bit of info on Illinois 1st Model Case History
 
Posts: 2093 | Location: British Columbia in Canada | Registered: March 02, 2011
IHC Member 1291
Picture of Buster Beck
posted
Thank you. In our Illinois data base we only have 7 of these mis-marked cases entered to date between 1928 and 1929.

https://ihc185.infopop.cc/eve/f...1029912/m/8281069912

These are scarce if not rare and require more $$$$ to get one unless you stumble across one that someone is unaware of Wink

regards,
bb
 
Posts: 6376 | Location: Texas in the USA | Registered: July 27, 2009
IHC Life Member
Picture of Robert Lee Milliron
posted
New man on the job. Stuff happens.
 
Posts: 663 | Location: North Carolina in the USA | Registered: June 01, 2005
posted
This watch is complimented by the correct box,bag and papers. One of my best!
 
Posts: 91 | Location: Indiana in the USA | Registered: September 09, 2015
Administrative Assistant
Picture of Dr. Debbie Irvine
posted

William,

Congratulations on an original timepiece.

Can you please provide movement number as well as close up image of your box label and papers so that we can add tht information into our database.

Thanks,

Debbie

Smile
 
Posts: 5386 | Location: Northern Ohio in the U.S.A. | Registered: December 04, 2002
posted
Dec 25 1928

 
Posts: 91 | Location: Indiana in the USA | Registered: September 09, 2015
posted
Movement

movement
 
Posts: 91 | Location: Indiana in the USA | Registered: September 09, 2015
posted
Box

 
Posts: 91 | Location: Indiana in the USA | Registered: September 09, 2015
posted
Set... hope this is of value

 
Posts: 91 | Location: Indiana in the USA | Registered: September 09, 2015
Administrative Assistant
Picture of Dr. Debbie Irvine
posted

Thanks William!

 
Posts: 5386 | Location: Northern Ohio in the U.S.A. | Registered: December 04, 2002
IHC Member 1101
Site Moderator
Picture of Steve Middlesworth
posted
If not for the box I would have said in all likely hood this would not have been an original combination. It seems this movement got pushed back in the vault and forgotten as it is from 1927 and ended up in a 1928 case, a late 1928 it appears as well. Very interesting set.
 
Posts: 1980 | Location: Kentucky in the USA | Registered: March 18, 2008
posted
Was received as a Christmas gift in 1928. $65.00 had to be a chunk of money in 1928
 
Posts: 91 | Location: Indiana in the USA | Registered: September 09, 2015
IHC Life Member
Picture of Larry Lamphier
posted
Notice that the case number is off one digit?

On the case it ends in an 8, and on the box and tag it ends in a 9.

Regards,
Larry
 
Posts: 2733 | Location: Northeastern United States | Registered: February 28, 2010
IHC Member 1357
posted
Your right Larry.Another mystery?
Roger
 
Posts: 4094 | Location: Carbon, Texas in the USA | Registered: January 24, 2010
posted
looks like that one just has errors following it , I still think that 65.00 in 1929 was really something .
 
Posts: 1574 | Location: Maryland in the USA | Registered: June 04, 2015
IHC Member 1357
posted
Case stamped in error.Case number wrong on hang tag=Monday morning hangover.A comedy of errors.
 
Posts: 4094 | Location: Carbon, Texas in the USA | Registered: January 24, 2010
posted
Wonder if the turmoil of hamilton taking over played into it. Or if was just good scotch
 
Posts: 91 | Location: Indiana in the USA | Registered: September 09, 2015
IHC Life Member
Picture of Robert Lee Milliron
posted
Employers didn't have drug and alcohol testing in 1928.
 
Posts: 663 | Location: North Carolina in the USA | Registered: June 01, 2005
posted
That watch was a nice Christmas present -- $65 in 1928 is about $900 today, according to the Department of Labor's inflation calculator.
 
Posts: 129 | Location: Fort Worth, Texas in the USA | Registered: April 17, 2015
posted
Thanks everyone for your input. Especially you Buster with your input of how many are known to exist.
 
Posts: 91 | Location: Indiana in the USA | Registered: September 09, 2015
IHC Member 1291
Picture of Buster Beck
posted
Thanks, but let me be perfectly clear Wink how many are known to exist is "UNKNOWN". IHC185 and our membership have discovered 8 [which includes yours]. It will be a small number, but there are NO factory records to help us, so what we and others "discover" along the way will be helpful to add to our database.

If you have a Bunn Special in one of these mis-marked cases, feel free to let us know in this thread.

regards,
bb
 
Posts: 6376 | Location: Texas in the USA | Registered: July 27, 2009
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


©2002-2023 Internet Horology Club 185™ - Lindell V. Riddle President - All Rights Reserved Worldwide

Internet Horology Club 185™ is the "Family-Friendly" place for Watch and Clock Collectors