Internet Horology Club 185
Illinois watch aficionados what do you think?

This topic can be found at:
https://ihc185.infopop.cc/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/1086047761/m/4283916687

November 19, 2015, 10:42
William Schlueter
Illinois watch aficionados what do you think?
I have a 60 hr Bunn that is in a model one case but marked 29. Could this be a factory error? Would like to hear your opinions. All numbers match so it isnt a a wrong back.


November 19, 2015, 10:45
William Schlueter
Clearly marked m9del 29 in correct font


November 19, 2015, 10:46
William Schlueter
4

front

November 19, 2015, 10:47
William Schlueter
Top view

crown

November 19, 2015, 11:00
Lorne Wasylishen
You pretty well have to go with factory error but hopefully Buster will chime in with his vast knowledge.

In the meantime here is a good bit of info on Illinois 1st Model Case History
November 19, 2015, 12:31
Buster Beck
Thank you. In our Illinois data base we only have 7 of these mis-marked cases entered to date between 1928 and 1929.

https://ihc185.infopop.cc/eve/f...1029912/m/8281069912

These are scarce if not rare and require more $$$$ to get one unless you stumble across one that someone is unaware of Wink

regards,
bb
November 19, 2015, 14:24
Robert Lee Milliron
New man on the job. Stuff happens.
November 19, 2015, 15:45
William Schlueter
This watch is complimented by the correct box,bag and papers. One of my best!
November 20, 2015, 08:47
Dr. Debbie Irvine

William,

Congratulations on an original timepiece.

Can you please provide movement number as well as close up image of your box label and papers so that we can add tht information into our database.

Thanks,

Debbie

Smile

November 20, 2015, 15:00
William Schlueter
Dec 25 1928


November 20, 2015, 15:01
William Schlueter
Movement

movement

November 20, 2015, 15:02
William Schlueter
Box


November 20, 2015, 15:04
William Schlueter
Set... hope this is of value


November 21, 2015, 09:38
Dr. Debbie Irvine

Thanks William!


November 21, 2015, 22:16
Steve Middlesworth
If not for the box I would have said in all likely hood this would not have been an original combination. It seems this movement got pushed back in the vault and forgotten as it is from 1927 and ended up in a 1928 case, a late 1928 it appears as well. Very interesting set.
November 22, 2015, 07:31
William Schlueter
Was received as a Christmas gift in 1928. $65.00 had to be a chunk of money in 1928
November 22, 2015, 19:22
Larry Lamphier
Notice that the case number is off one digit?

On the case it ends in an 8, and on the box and tag it ends in a 9.

Regards,
Larry
November 22, 2015, 20:13
Roger Stephens
Your right Larry.Another mystery?
Roger
November 22, 2015, 21:02
Kevin Hoffman
looks like that one just has errors following it , I still think that 65.00 in 1929 was really something .
November 22, 2015, 21:47
Roger Stephens
Case stamped in error.Case number wrong on hang tag=Monday morning hangover.A comedy of errors.
November 23, 2015, 18:32
William Schlueter
Wonder if the turmoil of hamilton taking over played into it. Or if was just good scotch
November 23, 2015, 20:47
Robert Lee Milliron
Employers didn't have drug and alcohol testing in 1928.
November 24, 2015, 22:05
John Watkins
That watch was a nice Christmas present -- $65 in 1928 is about $900 today, according to the Department of Labor's inflation calculator.
December 02, 2015, 18:37
William Schlueter
Thanks everyone for your input. Especially you Buster with your input of how many are known to exist.
December 03, 2015, 09:38
Buster Beck
Thanks, but let me be perfectly clear Wink how many are known to exist is "UNKNOWN". IHC185 and our membership have discovered 8 [which includes yours]. It will be a small number, but there are NO factory records to help us, so what we and others "discover" along the way will be helpful to add to our database.

If you have a Bunn Special in one of these mis-marked cases, feel free to let us know in this thread.

regards,
bb