WWT Shows | CLICK TO: Join and Support Internet Horology Club 185™ | IHC185™ Forums |
![]() |
• Check Out Our... • • TWO Book Offer! • |
Go ![]() | New Topic ![]() | Find-Or-Search ![]() | Notify ![]() | Tools ![]() | Reply to Post ![]() | ![]() |
I expect the answer is "both", but should I get a staking set or a jeweling set first? It's easy to see if a balance staff is broken, but it usually takes more effort to determine the state of the jewels. I guess I've answered my own question. Is there anything else I should consider? | |||
|
Don't do what I did Michael. That is start with a small staking set, then get a better one, only to buy a 3rd to get a good one. Get a real nice complete invertro set With the jeweling attachment and be done with it. | ||||
|
IHC Life Member![]() |
If $$ is a problem get the staking set first. A lot of jewels can be replaced with out an expensive set. I have a jeweling set and I rarely use it as most of the work can be done with a good staking set. The better ones have reamers too and a micrometer. | |||
|
Thanks for the input, gentlemen. The tax refund should be here soon, then I'll keep my eye out for a staking set with jeweling attachment. | ||||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
![]() | Your request is being processed... |
|