One of my Columbus's Railway King has a printed "ADJUSTED". It is Serial #312834 on a two tone movement. It has a safety pinion, size 18 Silverode case. It had Columbus Railway King on the dial and the movement. It has Roman Numerals on the dial with SOB Bezel and case and a double sunk dial.
Michael C. Bussacco
Posts: 46 | Location: Scranton, Pennsylvania in the USA | Registered: January 28, 2015
My other Columbus Railway King pocket watch has a Choo-Choo dial in a size 18, 16 jewels, double sunk dials with Roman Numerals. It is a 4 oz. Sterling Silver American Waltham Case. The date is 1899, a two tone movement, Serial #345,239 and is lever set. "Adjusted" is printed like the first pocket watch.
Michael C. Bussacco
Posts: 46 | Location: Scranton, Pennsylvania in the USA | Registered: January 28, 2015
Your first picture of the "Adjusted" in script, looks like a possible addition after it left the factory to me. But then I am not a Columbus scholar, so take me like a grain of salt. If I had to "surrender" a guess, my guess would be that the watch, if the "adjusted" is a factory addition it might be 1902 as it reminds me of font that Studebaker might have used around then.
Sorry to not be of much help, but please always enter the serial number when you are looking for answers.
regards, bb
Posts: 6376 | Location: Texas in the USA | Registered: July 27, 2009
These are not very often seen with the fancy script, but they do exist marked like this from the factory.
I have seen the fancy script previous on a few of these, looks like it has the whiplash regulator and if it is the 15 jewel version it was RR grade in it's day.
Can you please advise of the serial number?
cheers, bila
Posts: 2265 | Location: Gladstone in Australia | Registered: January 14, 2011
regulator is whiplash and #117658 thanks for info, I have a few more of these with script adjusted, when I come across them I will post them serial #s Ron Granneman aka ebay barberr
Posts: 20 | Location: Northern Ohio in the USA | Registered: September 11, 2007
I have a couple dozen Columbus pocket watches, some from 1870s, '80s, '90s, and '00s, but I don't think any of them have "Adjusted" in cursive script. I'll have to take another look when I get home from Florida, where the thermometer hit a chilly 72 degrees today .
Here's a question, though. I've always assumed that text and numerical markings on the plates of my Columbus watches --- e.g., "Columbus Watch Co.", "Safety Pinion," "Adjusted," and the movement serial number, etc., were stamped into the plates rather than engraved... EXCEPT for the early Swiss movements imported by Dietrich Gruen, which look more engraved. Do you think this is correct?
Posts: 156 | Location: Columbus, Ohio in the USA | Registered: November 16, 2011
Dennis, glad to see your posting and I hope all is well. Manu of the "engravings" are actually "stamps", however that said, they were not (usually) "hammered" in, but rather compression stamped "slowly" and to a limit of pressure. So it was more like "embossing" the pattern. As the watch plates were nickel, this was a perfect way to "coin" in a very complex pattern. Some glaring exceptions would be the beautifully intricate artwork on many of the Aurora movements where the distinct details make it clear they were actually diamond or tool steel engraved . . .
Posts: 6492 | Location: Southern California in the USA | Registered: July 19, 2007
I just had a quick browse of the movements I have and of some descriptions of watches in Company ads and picture plates from Meggers & Ehrhardt books I have.
What I can discern (could be barking up the wrong tree, but here goes), the "cursive script seem to appear through runs from the mid 25,000 through to the early 122,000 serial numbers.
The block scripts seem to appear through out most serial number runs ranging from 126,000 and upwards serial number runs.
Please be aware that there are probably exceptions to this and also that I am baseing this info on only the watches I have (only a small sample) or have seen as well as the advertising data and also the researchers that have done previous work.
Ron's watch looks to be either a Grade 63 or 95 if it is a genuine open face watch (not side winder) or Grade 23 or 34 if in the hunter configuration. The only difference between the designated grades in both the open face and hunter seem to be single and double sunk dial variations.
As for your question Dennis I do not know if the markings were stamped or engraved, as I do not have any info relating to this.
Regards to All.
Posts: 2265 | Location: Gladstone in Australia | Registered: January 14, 2011