WWT Shows CLICK TO: Join and Support Internet Horology Club 185™ IHC185™ Forums

• Check Out Our... •
• TWO Book Offer! •
Go
New Topic
Find-Or-Search
Notify
Tools
Reply to Post
  
992B Question "Click" to Login or Register 
posted
Would a 992b from the 1941-42 era be proper in a #17 case?
 
Posts: 767 | Location: Los Osos, California USA | Registered: December 12, 2002
posted
Earliest 992b serial # recorded with 17 case is around 1957.

https://ihc185.infopop.cc/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/254108073/m/674108549

charlie
 
Posts: 719 | Registered: December 15, 2002
IHC President
Life Member
Picture of Lindell V. Riddle
posted

One word answer... NO!

But seriously Jerry, let us know what you find inside the case-back.

The first catalog showing the 17 was 1958 if I recall correctly, however they were available before that.

Earliest Model 17 cases bore the Keystone markings you'll see when following the link Charlie provided. I have no pictures of this one as yet, but the earliest one in my collection is marked Keystone and here are the particulars.

Movement C437646 which we feel is 1956 production.

Case is number K099820 marked Hamilton / Keystone RR Model.

That one is the lowest number 992B in Case 17 combination I am aware of.

Wink
 
Posts: 10553 | Location: Northeastern Ohio in the USA | Registered: November 19, 2002
posted
Case # K405745
 
Posts: 767 | Location: Los Osos, California USA | Registered: December 12, 2002
IHC President
Life Member
Picture of Lindell V. Riddle
posted

Jerry,

What else do you find? Sounds like that is a Hamilton RR Keystone marked case. Check the link Charlie provided for that particular marking. Your case number is mid-1950s from the information we've accumulated at this point.

And just for fun, what is the movement number?

Lindell

Wink
 
Posts: 10553 | Location: Northeastern Ohio in the USA | Registered: November 19, 2002
posted
This is not mine, but the movement number is C7230.
 
Posts: 767 | Location: Los Osos, California USA | Registered: December 12, 2002
Picture of Robert M. Sweet
posted
Jerry,
These 3 cases would be correct for the 1941-42 timeframe.

Robert

 
Posts: 553 | Location: Southwest Virginia U.S.A. | Registered: December 27, 2004
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


©2002-2023 Internet Horology Club 185™ - Lindell V. Riddle President - All Rights Reserved Worldwide

Internet Horology Club 185™ is the "Family-Friendly" place for Watch and Clock Collectors