Over the years I've seen a few pictures of 16s RR grade Walthams made for "F.Q. Hatch"., with the # 1047 on them.These were '99 or '08 models.Just wondering if any 18 sizes have been seen, and if anyone would know what the "1047" meant.Thanks!...Ted.
Posts: 1323 | Location: Lebanon, Connecticut USA | Registered: March 28, 2008
Hi Tom, It was F.Q. One I had seen had the name in real elaborate Old English, the other in capital letters.I wonder if he was a RR inspector?One of these is shown on pg. 87 of Roy Ehrhardt's vol. one encyclopedia.It's marked No. 1047, specially adjusted for F.Q. Hatch & Co., 21 jewels, adjusted 5 positions.I think private label rairoads like this are pretty cool.Thanks again, Ted.
Posts: 1323 | Location: Lebanon, Connecticut USA | Registered: March 28, 2008
I wish I had something to report, I searched the name every way I could think of with no luck. On some of these without a city or at least a state to go by it is like looking for a needle in a hay stack.
I will keep looking though. That is a nice looking movement in the book, I am guessing from about 1908?
Tom
Posts: 5107 | Location: New Mexico in the USA | Registered: January 27, 2007
Hi Jerry & Tom, I still don't have any way to post a picture of it, otherwise I would.I seem to remember that Hatch was in either L.A or San Francisco, don't remember which.It looks like it may be a 645 grade, specially marked., Railroad for sure.Seems to me that if this guy was having Railroad watches made, he must have been a RR inspector. I have to ask, Tom, are you a private investigator by trade? You are quite a detective!Thanks and Best Regards, Ted.
Posts: 1323 | Location: Lebanon, Connecticut USA | Registered: March 28, 2008
Here he is listed in the 1901 "Railway Age" Vol 31 "Mr. FO Hatch has been appointed general agent of the Chicago Great Western at San Francisco in place of Mr. CO Johnson, promoted and transferred."
Posts: 1499 | Location: Rancho Cucamonga, California USA | Registered: December 20, 2006
And here is his temporary address after being displaced by the San Fran earthquake. "Temporary Addresses of San Francisco Railway Officers. ... For the Chicago Great Western, FO Hatch, general agent, 1023 Telegraph avenue, Oakland, Ca."
Posts: 1499 | Location: Rancho Cucamonga, California USA | Registered: December 20, 2006
Could you post a link to one of those articles. So you are saying they show him as F. O.? I am stumped I can not get him to come up on any subscription sites or google.
Tom
Posts: 5107 | Location: New Mexico in the USA | Registered: January 27, 2007
Thank you ,Tom & Ray.I also tried searching before I asked about this, and like Tom, I came up with nothing.It's a nice looking Waltham at any rate.I'm really curious as to what "1047" meant.At the time Ray mentioned, 1901,18sizes were still going strong, so I still wonder if he had any of those made too.Thanks again, Ted.
Posts: 1323 | Location: Lebanon, Connecticut USA | Registered: March 28, 2008
I am interested to find out how Ray found this info, even when I search for the sources he listed I don't find those particular ones.
I thought maybe if we could find stuff on him that the number 1047 might pop up, like an address or something relevant to him or his business location.
Tom
Posts: 5107 | Location: New Mexico in the USA | Registered: January 27, 2007
Hi Tom, I usually do a check in Google books, That's where I found him. I will grab a link to the page and post it. As far as "besting you"....Hardly, I just got lucky and beat you to it
Posts: 1499 | Location: Rancho Cucamonga, California USA | Registered: December 20, 2006
This is strange, sure looks like a "Q" on the watch.I don't believe an O in Old English has that "tail" under it.The other one I had seen a pic of was in regular capitals, and it also was a Q.I can't remember where I saw that one, though.
Posts: 1323 | Location: Lebanon, Connecticut USA | Registered: March 28, 2008
Thanks Ray, I don't know why I can not get it to come up when I search, I have searched exactly like you said & nothing. If I follow you links it brings them up. I really don't know how Google works & I didn't think you got different results based on where you live but maybe you do.
Ted, I to wonder about the middle initial, it sure looks like a Q to me, it has been one of the more difficult names. Like I said the Gold book has it as I.Q. & Co., which is obviously wrong. If you look at the image I posted it sure looks like a Q but the typing under the image list F.O.
Tom
Posts: 5107 | Location: New Mexico in the USA | Registered: January 27, 2007
Hi again, I just hit a jackpot on this one.I tried a search on this site under "Hatch Waltham" and a whole slew of stuff came up.Apparently, this same question came up before.Apperently, it's "J. Q. Hatch" instead.There's one shown "No. 1024" also. This mystery keeps getting stranger all the time!Man, what a nice find it would be to run across one of these, Hatch had good taste, they really look sharp!One shown has really fancy damaskeening, gold lettering, and 17 jewels.Thanks ! Ted.
Posts: 1323 | Location: Lebanon, Connecticut USA | Registered: March 28, 2008
I tried changing Ray's search on Google for "J.Q. Hatch & Co.", and an ad comes up , but I can't get the whole thing to show.It's cut off , all you can see is the name.Says he's an inspector for several RR's.
Posts: 1323 | Location: Lebanon, Connecticut USA | Registered: March 28, 2008