WWT Shows CLICK TO: Join and Support Internet Horology Club 185™ IHC185™ Forums

• Check Out Our... •
• TWO Book Offer! •
Go
New Topic
Find-Or-Search
Notify
Tools
Reply to Post
  
OK Here's my 954 "Click" to Login or Register 
IHC Member 1016
posted
Some photos Brad requested.

We got our 954s at about the same time and like to compare! I have to give thanks to Jared Brinker for his help on this one.

 
Posts: 3112 | Location: Klamath Falls, Oregon in the USA | Registered: October 13, 2007
IHC Member 1016
posted
movement 1

 
Posts: 3112 | Location: Klamath Falls, Oregon in the USA | Registered: October 13, 2007
IHC Member 1016
posted
movement 2

 
Posts: 3112 | Location: Klamath Falls, Oregon in the USA | Registered: October 13, 2007
IHC Member 1508
posted
Wow! Very nice Mike! I'm jealous, 'cause my pictures are so small compared to yours. I love that fish scale demaskeening, it's gorgeous! And that is the style of dial I was looking to put on mine, when I found that "Richardson's Special" dial. Is yours a lever or pendant set? Brad
 
Posts: 956 | Location: Wenatchee, Washington in the USA | Registered: December 14, 2010
IHC Member 1016
posted
I think the size of the pictures is the least important thing. It is a Pendant set. The dial actually has a chip below the seconds register but doesn't show with the bezel on. Only thing I need now is a Hodge Special Big Grin
 
Posts: 3112 | Location: Klamath Falls, Oregon in the USA | Registered: October 13, 2007
IHC Member 1508
posted
I was just griping that it's hard to see the detail on mine because the pictures are a lot smaller. Mine has a small chip just under the hands. It's hard to see, and I decided not to mess with it. These are very nice watches, and I find myself wondering why Hamilton didn't make very many of them. Brad
 
Posts: 956 | Location: Wenatchee, Washington in the USA | Registered: December 14, 2010
IHC Member 1016
posted
Brad, I would think that the 974, or the 992 took over. If you needed a Railroad approved watch 992, if you needed a decent time keeper in a 17j the 974 was adequate, and probably cheaper to produce. Once a grade "caught on" they seemed to sell well. It would have been in Hamilton's best interest to have fewer grades available if the net resut was the same number sold. With so few 954s made I would think they just didn't sell well enough to justify the duplication of 16s timekeepers. JMHO
 
Posts: 3112 | Location: Klamath Falls, Oregon in the USA | Registered: October 13, 2007
IHC Life Member
Picture of David Abbe
posted
A very nice specimin indeed, I must cokmpliment you on twol levels, first for the watch itself and second sharing your enjoyment with learning more by collection of the the history, development and technology behind these masterpieces of time while so many collectors are enjoined only with "Headliners" such as the 992.
 
Posts: 6492 | Location: Southern California in the USA | Registered: July 19, 2007
IHC Member 1508
posted
They also came out with the 972, which, as far as I can tell, is the same as a 954. They're both 17j, adjusted to 5 positions, and lever-set. Other than the fancy demaskeening on the 954, they look identical.
 
Posts: 956 | Location: Wenatchee, Washington in the USA | Registered: December 14, 2010
IHC Member 1016
posted
Yes, I think the numerals 97X meant more than 95X. Just like today.
 
Posts: 3112 | Location: Klamath Falls, Oregon in the USA | Registered: October 13, 2007
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


©2002-2023 Internet Horology Club 185™ - Lindell V. Riddle President - All Rights Reserved Worldwide

Internet Horology Club 185™ is the "Family-Friendly" place for Watch and Clock Collectors