WWT Shows CLICK TO: Join and Support Internet Horology Club 185™ IHC185™ Forums

• Check Out Our... •
• TWO Book Offer! •
Page 1 2 3 4 
Go
New Topic
Find-Or-Search
Notify
Tools
Reply to Post
  
Burlington Special or Burlington question "Click" to Login or Register 
posted June 06, 2011 09:59
On the watch with the 3 "chain links",see if you can make out what is inside each one.If there is an F,an L and a T in that order,It would be International Order Of Oddfellows.Letters stand for Faith,Love and Truth.Norm
 
Posts: 484 | Location: Georgia in the United States | Registered: August 04, 2010
IHC Life Member
Picture of David Abbe
posted June 06, 2011 12:43
This is a Burlington case catalog page which includes one of the Odd Fellows design choices from that particular period.

 
Posts: 6492 | Location: Southern California in the USA | Registered: July 19, 2007
Picture of Jerry Spidell II
posted June 13, 2011 04:04
They had crystals when I was a kid. My dad stored them with a bunch of coins. Too bad he did not put them in a deposit box or something. Story is My grandfather found the Burlington Special in the sand on a beach in California. Probably true as he was a poor man and wouldn't buy a watch like this. Nice to know they are worth something but I think they are just too cool to give up. Just amazes me the fine work inside these time pieces. Whatever the condition they are fun to admire. I will look up Knights of Pythias. Sounds like a Mason group. Thank you for the info. What are some good resources for restoration?
 
Posts: 13 | Location: Des Moines, Iowa in the USA | Registered: June 02, 2011
Picture of Richard Romero
posted April 07, 2012 12:01
I recently came across two early Getty movements and both have dials that are signed only Burlington. They both have the same dial and hands. Both movements are 17 jewels for hunting cases. So now it appears not all of the early movements were signed Burlington Special.

 
Posts: 1413 | Location: Fremont, California in the USA | Registered: February 06, 2010
Picture of Richard Romero
posted April 07, 2012 12:04
Serial # 1,889,693 from 1906 Grade 174

 
Posts: 1413 | Location: Fremont, California in the USA | Registered: February 06, 2010
Picture of Richard Romero
posted April 07, 2012 12:10
Here's the second Burlington.

 
Posts: 1413 | Location: Fremont, California in the USA | Registered: February 06, 2010
Picture of Richard Romero
posted April 07, 2012 12:14
Serial # 1,984,365 from 1907 Grade 174
RR

ebay auction images

 
Posts: 1413 | Location: Fremont, California in the USA | Registered: February 06, 2010
IHC Life Member
Picture of David Abbe
posted April 07, 2012 13:45
1889693 and 1984365 are Grade 174 unadjusted movements. Not surprising except the "Burlington" with no "Special" dial signature.
 
Posts: 6492 | Location: Southern California in the USA | Registered: July 19, 2007
Picture of Ken Habeeb
posted August 20, 2013 18:21
Re: an older post and thread: Claude, the Burlington Special hunters are not common, but I saw this one back in late July 2013. Bought it at your rec. because it was triple-signed.

kh

 
Posts: 921 | Location: California in the USA | Registered: March 25, 2013
Picture of Ken Habeeb
posted August 20, 2013 18:22
the movement on the other side of that dial...

 
Posts: 921 | Location: California in the USA | Registered: March 25, 2013
Picture of Ken Habeeb
posted August 20, 2013 18:23
and what that case looks like..

 
Posts: 921 | Location: California in the USA | Registered: March 25, 2013
Picture of Ken Habeeb
posted August 20, 2013 18:45
This, of course, is a model 185 with those same odd hands seen on John Flahive's open-face grade 806 from 1913. The hunter above came out of the factory in 1910 - consistent with David's almost ironclad finding!
 
Posts: 921 | Location: California in the USA | Registered: March 25, 2013
posted August 21, 2013 21:18
I like it when people post topics and pictures so that you can see watches that might be of interest so I am glad my post triggered the purchase. My father-in-law was a yardmaster at the Sandusky Ohio N&W yards and he had a Burlington 21j that was passed on to him his father-in-law. On some sites people treat Burlingtons like they treat Hampdens (no respect). It is nice to know my 19j hunter is not that common.
 
Posts: 1797 | Location: Michigan in the USA | Registered: September 19, 2009
Picture of Peter Kaszubski
posted August 21, 2013 21:25
I have one Burlington Special hunter case same us
Kens and one open face both 3 fingers and 19 jewels same dials pictures will be posted tomorrow
and both are great runners with in a minute a week
open face one is my carry for this month.
 
Posts: 4395 | Location: Arizona in the USA | Registered: July 23, 2011
Picture of Peter Kaszubski
posted August 22, 2013 12:12
here are the pics.

 
Posts: 4395 | Location: Arizona in the USA | Registered: July 23, 2011
Picture of Peter Kaszubski
posted August 22, 2013 12:13
and the movements

 
Posts: 4395 | Location: Arizona in the USA | Registered: July 23, 2011
Picture of Ken Habeeb
posted August 22, 2013 14:55
Nice! The three-fingered Getty brothers.
 
Posts: 921 | Location: California in the USA | Registered: March 25, 2013
IHC Member 1736
posted August 23, 2014 23:44
I just picked up a very nice HC Burlington 21J Adj5p Pendant set grade 108. It is triple signed, has the bold Arabic railroad track dial with three matching moon hands.

I can't figure out how to value it. The closest match I get in the Fat book is the Illinois 21J, GJS, HC

 
Posts: 2032 | Location: San Diego, California in the USA | Registered: August 30, 2012
IHC Member 1736
posted August 23, 2014 23:46
And, the movement

 
Posts: 2032 | Location: San Diego, California in the USA | Registered: August 30, 2012
posted August 24, 2014 14:48
I would value you as you tried to, I have not seen too many of the 21j hunters mostly what I see are the 19j hunters. There has always been some debate if "Positions" refers to 3 or 5 but even at 3 they would have met the requirements for most RR lines in the time they were produced. I will comment it is a very clean looking watch from the pictures of the dial and movement, well worth picking up especially if the case is as nice as the rest of the watch.
 
Posts: 1797 | Location: Michigan in the USA | Registered: September 19, 2009
IHC Member 1736
posted August 24, 2014 17:40
Thank you sir, I'm never sure just how much liberty I can take with mixing and matching descriptions in the book. Sometimes I worry that it's just a feel good thing.

Problem with the whole RR thing is that this one is a pendant set. The case is ultra nice, low mileage.

Still a great gentleman's watch.

I got a great deal on it because it has an odd monogram and the seller listed it as non-running rather than risk an unhappy buyer.
 
Posts: 2032 | Location: San Diego, California in the USA | Registered: August 30, 2012
IHC Member 1110
posted August 26, 2014 21:35
Just looking back at all the great pictures of these nice Burlingtons.I think it would be quite the collection to have one each of these many different types.It would be a real crusade, that's for sure, especially since so many have been recased.
 
Posts: 1323 | Location: Lebanon, Connecticut USA | Registered: March 28, 2008
IHC Member 1955
Picture of Michael P. McNamee
posted September 13, 2014 22:42
This is a wonderful post that has been ongoing for almost 4 years. I've read all of the posts, but I still have a couple questions about my Burlington Special, serial # 2,026,410, which I think dates it to about 1910. I'll show some photos below. I believe its a Grade 174, 19J, OF, 3/4 plate Getty movement. It is not marked "adjusted."

My questions:

1) Can anyone identify the Model? and

2) Does the fact that it is not marked adjusted mean that it absolutely was not adjusted at all at the factory? I noted that there are earlier Burlington Specials that are marked "adjusted" without position designation, and that there is speculation as to whether that meant adjusted to 3 as opposed to 5 positions. I thought it would be kind of strange that a completely unadjusted movement of a "Burlington Special" would have been manufactured after Illinois began manufacturing adjusted ones.

Any thoughts would be appreciated!

Here's the dial:

 
Posts: 1088 | Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota in the USA | Registered: October 15, 2013
IHC Member 1955
Picture of Michael P. McNamee
posted September 13, 2014 22:43
Here's the movement:

 
Posts: 1088 | Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota in the USA | Registered: October 15, 2013
IHC Member 1955
Picture of Michael P. McNamee
posted September 13, 2014 22:45
Here's the case nomenclature:

 
Posts: 1088 | Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota in the USA | Registered: October 15, 2013
IHC Member 1736
posted September 13, 2014 23:05
Mike,

I come up with a Grade 174, 19-ON5L-U, 1907, total production 3,200

19J, Open face, Nickel, Model 5, Lever set, Unadjusted.

Additional notes include: Polished oval head screws, black or gold fill, patent regulator, DS enamel dial.

I would be inclined to think this dial is a transplant from another run.
 
Posts: 2032 | Location: San Diego, California in the USA | Registered: August 30, 2012
IHC Member 1955
Picture of Michael P. McNamee
posted September 13, 2014 23:15
Thanks Paul. What makes you think the dial is a transplant? Any thoughts about what kind of dial would have been part of this run?
 
Posts: 1088 | Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota in the USA | Registered: October 15, 2013
IHC Member 1736
posted September 13, 2014 23:48
I may have jumped the gun there Mike.

I just associated this dial with the higher grade movements... It looks like as long as your movement is 1915 or earlier, you are fine.
 
Posts: 2032 | Location: San Diego, California in the USA | Registered: August 30, 2012
IHC Member 1955
Picture of Michael P. McNamee
posted September 14, 2014 00:13
Thanks for thinking about my issue, Paul. I just love these dials, and the fact that they highlight the great history of a US upper Midwest RR that prominently included my home state of Minnesota. It seems really hard to find one of these dials in really nice condition like this one is. The watch was inexpensive, so the grade of the movement doesn't really matter to me. But I did want to accurately identify the model number and whether it was adjusted to some degree. If this is a Model 5 Grade 174, I'd be curious to know what Models 1-4 look like!

Anyway, I really appreciate the response!
 
Posts: 1088 | Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota in the USA | Registered: October 15, 2013
IHC Member 1736
posted September 14, 2014 01:10
Illinois models 4 and 5 are all Getty's (apostrophe or no in Getty plural)?

Models 1,2 and 3 predate the Getty.

Grades are subsets of models.
 
Posts: 2032 | Location: San Diego, California in the USA | Registered: August 30, 2012
IHC Member 1955
Picture of Michael P. McNamee
posted September 14, 2014 01:16
Good to know. I thought models were subsets of grades.
 
Posts: 1088 | Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota in the USA | Registered: October 15, 2013
Picture of Peter Kaszubski
posted September 14, 2014 13:15
Nice Burlington looks to be all original with case sweet .
 
Posts: 4395 | Location: Arizona in the USA | Registered: July 23, 2011
IHC Member 1955
Picture of Michael P. McNamee
posted September 14, 2014 21:42
Thanks Peter! Small hairline by 5, but otherwise seems in great shape.
 
Posts: 1088 | Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota in the USA | Registered: October 15, 2013
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3 4  
 


©2002-2025 Internet Horology Club 185™ - Lindell V. Riddle President - All Rights Reserved Worldwide

Internet Horology Club 185™ is the "Family-Friendly" place for Watch and Clock Collectors