WWT Shows | CLICK TO: Join and Support Internet Horology Club 185™ | IHC185™ Forums |
![]() |
• Check Out Our... • • TWO Book Offer! • |
Go ![]() | New Topic ![]() | Find-Or-Search ![]() | Notify ![]() | Tools ![]() | Reply to Post ![]() | ![]() |
IHC Member 1357 |
Just received this watch 18s.19jewels officalRR standard s/n 669221.Do not know the date of the manufacturing of this.The dial doesn't look right to me since it doesn't have the ball beside the numbers.Would like your input on this.Regards Roger ![]() | ||
|
IHC Member 1357 |
movt.needs a reg.spring ![]() | |||
|
IHC Vice President Pitfalls Moderator IHC Life Member ![]() |
Roger, The Gelson list says movement #669221 was finished in 1911. It's got a later dial on it, with CPR style numerals, from the 1920's. Best Regards, Ed | |||
|
IHC Member 1357 |
Thanks Edward,just a question would a regulator spring from a Hamilton 18s.fit? | |||
|
IHC Vice President Pitfalls Moderator IHC Life Member ![]() |
No. I don't think so. The Goldthwait's Patent regulator used on 18S Hamiltons is totally different than the 18S Ball-Hamilton regulator (see comparison photo). 18S Ball-Hamilton on the Left ------ 18S Hamilton on the Right (Goldthwait's Patent) ![]() | |||
|
Here's my 999 19 jewel from 1906 with what I assume is the original dial. I thought it was interesting (unfortunate) that it has also has a chip next to the 8. I was lucky to be able to find a really nice replacement dial but not so lucky with what I had to pay for it. Mine has a broken balance staff - is that the same one used on the 944? Bob ![]() | ||||
|
IHC Life Member Site Moderator ![]() |
I would bet there is a dial post under the damage on both dials, you see that often from people not unscrewing the dial screws enough and/or prying the dial off. | |||
|
You are right Tom. There is a dial foot right under the chip and a little of the porcelain on the back is broken off around that foot. | ||||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
![]() | Your request is being processed... |
|