WWT Shows CLICK TO: Join and Support Internet Horology Club 185™ IHC185™ Forums

• Check Out Our... •
• TWO Book Offer! •
Go
New Topic
Find-Or-Search
Notify
Tools
Reply to Post
  
Ball Hamilton 999 "Click" to Login or Register 
IHC Member 1357
posted
Just received this watch 18s.19jewels officalRR standard s/n 669221.Do not know the date of the manufacturing of this.The dial doesn't look right to me since it doesn't have the ball beside the numbers.Would like your input on this.Regards Roger

q
 
Posts: 4094 | Location: Carbon, Texas in the USA | Registered: January 24, 2010
IHC Member 1357
posted
movt.needs a reg.spring

q
 
Posts: 4094 | Location: Carbon, Texas in the USA | Registered: January 24, 2010
IHC Vice President
Pitfalls Moderator
IHC Life Member
Picture of Edward L. Parsons, Jr.
posted
Roger,

The Gelson list says movement #669221 was finished in 1911. It's got a later dial on it, with CPR style numerals, from the 1920's.


Best Regards,

Ed
 
Posts: 6696 | Location: Southwestern Pennsylvania, USA | Registered: April 19, 2004
IHC Member 1357
posted
Thanks Edward,just a question would a regulator spring from a Hamilton 18s.fit?
 
Posts: 4094 | Location: Carbon, Texas in the USA | Registered: January 24, 2010
IHC Vice President
Pitfalls Moderator
IHC Life Member
Picture of Edward L. Parsons, Jr.
posted
No. I don't think so. The Goldthwait's Patent regulator used on 18S Hamiltons is totally different than the 18S Ball-Hamilton regulator (see comparison photo).


18S Ball-Hamilton on the Left ------ 18S Hamilton on the Right (Goldthwait's Patent)

 
Posts: 6696 | Location: Southwestern Pennsylvania, USA | Registered: April 19, 2004
posted
Here's my 999 19 jewel from 1906 with what I assume is the original dial. I thought it was interesting (unfortunate) that it has also has a chip next to the 8. I was lucky to be able to find a really nice replacement dial but not so lucky with what I had to pay for it.
Mine has a broken balance staff - is that the same one used on the 944? Bob

Ball Hamilton 999 dial
 
Posts: 346 | Location: Woodland Hills, California in the USA | Registered: January 07, 2011
IHC Life Member
Site Moderator

Picture of Tom Brown
posted
I would bet there is a dial post under the damage on both dials, you see that often from people not unscrewing the dial screws enough and/or prying the dial off.
 
Posts: 5107 | Location: New Mexico in the USA | Registered: January 27, 2007
posted
You are right Tom. There is a dial foot right under the chip and a little of the porcelain on the back is broken off around that foot.
 
Posts: 346 | Location: Woodland Hills, California in the USA | Registered: January 07, 2011
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


©2002-2023 Internet Horology Club 185™ - Lindell V. Riddle President - All Rights Reserved Worldwide

Internet Horology Club 185™ is the "Family-Friendly" place for Watch and Clock Collectors