With the Elgin it can be made as an open face or a hunter. By just moving a few parts.
If you notice in these photos the movement has two holes for the winding stem, one at 12 & the other at 3. By moving the winding mechanism to either place you change it from open to hunter or back.
Tom
Posts: 5107 | Location: New Mexico in the USA | Registered: January 27, 2007
They never did catch on & just as they were trying to solve the problem of making both open face & hunter movements, they created a new problem, these movements are thicker than the standard movement so they will not fit in just any case.
Tom
Posts: 5107 | Location: New Mexico in the USA | Registered: January 27, 2007
Steve, Sorry, no pictures to add but I do enjoy yours as well as others. I did key on the comment about inflation. This is a link that the US Gov. has for an inflation calculator. http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/cpicalc.pl It only goes back to 1913 when they started tracking inflation. But if you were to have purchased your model No. 91 then for $180.00 that is $3937.69 in todays dollars according to the calculator. I always find this an interesting exercise when I am looking at today's values verses original cost.
LJ
Posts: 38 | Location: Zuzax, New Mexico USA | Registered: July 07, 2007
Tom, Thanks for the explanation and pics. To me it sounds like a good idea, but i am sure the extra size killed the project. Did other mfg's try it, or did they learn from Elgin's mistake?
Posts: 1488 | Location: New York State in the USA | Registered: March 04, 2008
The only other one I know of is New York Standard Watch Co. also tried one, I have never seen it so I am not sure how their's worked.
There was also a case made called a Muckle after it's maker, the inner movement holder rotates and one side of the movement has a glass front & the other side has a hinged cover, so any movement you have in it can be and open face or a hunter. I would like to have one of those cases but when I see them come up on ebay they go for a pretty penny.
Tom
Posts: 5107 | Location: New Mexico in the USA | Registered: January 27, 2007
Thanks a lot for the feedback, guys! Rockford had a convertable of another sort. On some models there was c little button in the back plate that would convert from a lever set to pendent set.
Posts: 827 | Location: Bloomington, Illinois in the USA | Registered: September 29, 2008
This 1885 Vintage Columbus 15 Jewel "Adjusted" has my curiosity really going. It seems to predate the "New" Columbus, and has the most fascinating regulator, . . . almost like it came from the mind of Mr. Gruen himself.
Posts: 6492 | Location: Southern California in the USA | Registered: July 19, 2007