WWT Shows | CLICK TO: Join and Support Internet Horology Club 185™ | IHC185™ Forums |
• Check Out Our... • • TWO Book Offer! • |
Go | New Topic | Find-Or-Search | Notify | Tools | Reply to Post |
Last night, a friend showed me an 83 Waltham with the Santa Fe Route marking on the movement. I looked up the serial number and found that it was a Crescent St. grade, 17 jewels and a hunting model. The dial matches one shown in the book Railroad Timekeeping, which came from the 1996 seminar in Rockford. (See item 30, page 12) My friend's dial is the same dial, but puts the word Waltham under the 12, and lacks the words Santa Fe Route. Any thoughts on these watches and dials? | |||
|
Jerry, It is my belief that these 83 model SF Routes should have a similarly marked dial. There are at least a couple dial variations which include the railroad style in single sunk and a more standard double sunk version. All seem to have the same "SF Route" logo below the 12. If I remember correctly, some (but not all) of the dials are also marked Waltham in an arc above the seconds bit. I have also seen a couple of these watches with dials marked "Santa Fe Railway System, Standard Dial". These may also be original. Having said all this, I have also seen a couple examples with the dial you describe. I know at least one of these that was added by the seller as a close approximation to the original. Hope this helps. Rhett Lucke | ||||
|
IHC President Life Member |
I agree completely with Rhett's comments, any watch like this is always far more desirable when everything matches. For decades on-end, a combination of dial collectors and greedy re-sellers removed the original dials from such watches. The dial collector would pull the original dial, replace it with something more ordinary and sell the watch, secreting the dial in his collection. Similarly, re-sellers swapped dials between a watch such as this and a more common model. They then had two of the more unusual watch to sell to unsuspecting buyers. These practices were especially notorious on the various Ball Brotherhoods. Today it can be difficult for us to set things right. Lindell | |||
|
Lindell, I can definately see the motivation for someone splitting up a dial and movement in an attempt to create two rare watches, but most dial collectors I know are also watch collectors and wouldnt think of splitting up an original matched set (i.e. Santa Fe Route movement and dial). I would think that most of these watches with missing dials are the result of someone replacing a damaged dial in an attempt to "upgrade" the watch. In the past I have seen many of these type of movements without the correct dial, but only a handful of the dials on other movements. Rhett Rhett Lucke | ||||
|
IHC President Life Member |
Rhett, you are probably right that most of the dial replacing over the years has been done with good intentions in mind. In my explanation above I was just trying to point out a practice that really irks me, that of separating the matching dial and movement to falsely "create" to watches of the same name for short term gain. So many Ball Brotherhoods have met the sad fate I described above we have actually reached the point where many modern-day collectors are confused as to the original configuration. Lindell | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Your request is being processed... |