February 14, 2005, 19:52
Justin J. MillerInfo requested for Mr. J. Bruce Weeks
Bruce could not reply to your post..would only do a quick reply. I think Pattey had the same problem???
Here are some pics for you out of the 1904 GK catalog.
The more I looked at the catalog I think your clock is not like the 561 as I said first, but like the #46... the omly differnce with yours and the number 46 is the size.. I will psot them both you tell me.
Justin
February 14, 2005, 19:54
Justin J. MillerHere is the one i thought it looked like before.. THIS IS NOT THE CORRECT # please look at the post below the pictues (#46)
February 14, 2005, 19:57
Justin J. MillerHere is the clock out of the shop of Bruce Weeks.
February 14, 2005, 20:02
Justin J. MillerHere it is GK case style #46
February 15, 2005, 08:21
J. Bruce WeeksJustin,
Yes, #46 seems to be exactly what we have here. It is 1/4 strike & quail, large movement and walnut casing. The dimensions seem about right, I will measure later today. Probably is going to be returned to the customer by Noon today. I am running about a week late on my promise. Jury duty all the month of February has put a crimp in my regular style.
I am not sure why you can only do a quick reply. Perhaps because it is a photo gallery post? I'm sure the system admin knows.
Thanks again!