I would refer to Tran's book on Gilbert clocks. Mine is in a box, the location of which is not yet known. Perhaps someone with a book could help. A picture of it would help out. I don't believe there is any date code on the clock itself.
Tom
Posts: 2537 | Location: Mount Angel, Oregon in the U.S.A. | Registered: November 19, 2002
Hi Bruce, Gilbert actually made several models using the same center section. They just put different tops and/or bottoms on the center section. (Search the archives for 'falmouth' and you will see an example that I have.) However, I'll assume you didn't show the top or bottom as they are just plain brass, which would narrow it down to 2 models: the 'Vista' and the 'Valerie'. The visual difference between these 2 is really just the height. The Valerie is about 9 3/4 inches high and the Vista is about 10 3/4 inches. (There is a gearing difference between the movements as the Valerie has a shorter pendulum. See the 'Falmouth' discussion for more info on this, too.) Tran's book has catalog cuts from 1913 but I believe Gilbert was making both of these models as early as 1903.
Posts: 331 | Location: Camarillo, California USA | Registered: May 03, 2005
Ack! I listed it under a thread...hardest(or maybe it was cheapest) clock movements ever worked on. Actually there were several other posters that agreed. I can't remember it it was on this site or the "green board".
Anyway, the worst part about it is removing the time train mainspring and replacing it, without doing damage to the second wheel (arbor and teeth) and third wheel arbor. Before attempting to remove this spring...STUDY it. I cannot remember if there was a good way to do it. The spring is a "hole end" spring, and the attachment is on that outside guard that you see on the bottom right of the movement. This is very thin brass and more likely than not breaks off. Causing the spring to expand rapidly and damaging the above mentions wheels. Not just one or the other sections of them but all of them! This was achknowleged by the other posters. Be prepared to send those gears out to be replaced(if you don't make gears yourself).
I purchased (from e-bay) a copy movement to "cut down" the cost. Unfortunatly, that movement was in the same shape. I eventually had the 1st and second gears made, and repaired all three lantern pinions as well.
The other thing to watch for is that the third and forth wheel look to be interchangable. Believe me they are not. Although you can interchange them and the clock will work for awhile, it will eventually stop.
Also, the strike side gears actually "cross" the time train and then back again to end at the "fan".
All in all I've promised myself NEVER to touch another one. Unfortunatly I'll probably break that promise, but at least I'll think about it for a while before I tackle another of these.
Maybe this would be a good movement for the infamous repairer...Dunkin Swish! I think that I would certainly try it!
greg
Posts: 497 | Location: Genoa, New York U.S.A. | Registered: November 06, 2003
Greg's original post is here (on this board). And I agree with Greg. The Falmouth was the first clock I bought when I started collecting clocks. It has, by far, the largest time investment in it of any clock or watch I've ever worked on!
Posts: 331 | Location: Camarillo, California USA | Registered: May 03, 2005