December 03, 2002, 14:58
Harold Visservery rare E. Howard case Nsz. my best one!!!!!
December 03, 2002, 15:08
Mike NardickHarold,
That case is Eye-Popping!
I'm wiping the slobber of my key board as I type

I just gotta ask, What type of camera are you using?
Light Sorce?
Please explain......
Mike

December 03, 2002, 15:23
Harold VisserHi Mike, I use a Nikon 995 digital camera. Took pic about noon outside here in sunny Scottsdale AZ.
Set camera on automatic with 3 second timer on and it did the rest! I believe it was 1/125 shutter speed. In bright sunshine I use a gallon milk jug with bottom and part of top cut out as a light diffuser, got that tip from Barry Goldberg.
Nothing to it!!
Harold

December 03, 2002, 15:34
Mike NardickHarold,
It's your Nikon 995 that did the trick

That is one Fine Camera!
Did you use the Milk Jug on this pic?
I thank You Very Much for the Info.....
*Looking for Sunshine in Pittsburgh, Pa*

Mike

December 03, 2002, 16:21
Harold VisserI didn't use the milk jug for that shot, took it in the shade, the reason I purchased the 995 is because of it's ability to focus to within .8 of one inch, allowing for some extreme close-ups.
Incedently, the case is by Keller & Untermeyer who
specialty was multicolor gold cases. Here is a shot of the movement taken in the sun with the high-tech milk jug as a light difuser.
Harold
December 03, 2002, 19:15
Brent FarrellA Nikon 995 is on the top of my chrismas list!!! Very detailed pictures of a fantastic case!!! The movement isnt so shabby either!!
NAWCC 157316
IHC 155
December 03, 2002, 20:10
Jim McLaughlinLooks like it belonged to royalty. Or, at least, some president of a large company. It would be very interesting to know the exact date of the watch and cost of the case...
Jim
December 03, 2002, 23:34
Harold VisserHello Jim, I have an 1889 discount supply house catalog that shows an almost duplicate watch/case combo like mine for $340.00. This watch also has engraving on dust cover.Uncle George was a very generous man to give away watch like this!!

Harold
December 06, 2002, 22:56
Jim McLaughlinHarold,
A watch in 1889 costing $340 would cost $6,434.73 in 2001 dollars. That's not counting the added value in antiquity. What a beautiful watch and case!
Jim