May 08, 2007, 09:39
Joseph T. CollinsHampden with something missing!
I saw this Hampden with NO serial number. The seller had a long explanation about it being "very rare" with no number and despite claims of "freshly serviced" was vague about his watchmaker saying either 11 or 15 jewels. What does the group think of their explaination?
Joe
May 08, 2007, 14:50
Edward L. Parsons, Jr.Yes, mismatched plates from different watches would explain the duplicate signature.
I've seen this sort of thing on other watches too, like Hamilton 992B's marked "992B" in two different places when a movement signature Type 4 watch has had its train bridge switched with one from one of the other 3 signatures.
May 08, 2007, 20:50
Robert SchusselI don't know early Hampdens but it is obivious that the font style differs in the two places--clearly the plate came from another watch.
Bob
May 10, 2007, 18:44
Edward L. Parsons, Jr.This is getting to be an interesting topic. In 18 size Walthams I've also noticed serial numbers on different plates. I did a little searching around the site and found some photos showing different locations.
Model 92 with the Serial Number on the Main Plate . . .