WWT Shows | CLICK TO: Join and Support Internet Horology Club 185™ | IHC185™ Forums |
• Check Out Our... • • TWO Book Offer! • |
Go | New Topic | Find-Or-Search | Notify | Tools | Reply to Post |
I never would have thought Hamilton put a Roman Numeral Dial on a 992 in 1930-1931. A boxed set recently sold on eBay with a Model No. 2 case and an Antique Roman Numeral dial. The numbers appear to match. RR Dial and Movement | |||
|
Box with Label | ||||
|
IHC Vice President Pitfalls Moderator IHC Life Member |
Nice bold RN dial Richard. I've never seen one that late. Best Regards, Ed | |||
|
IHC Member 1357 |
Just to add to an old thread.I just got this 992 S/N 2576778=1930 with a Roman numeral dial as shown above described as A.R.E. on the box.Hands are different and it is in a WGF Model 5 case S/N 53922. | |||
|
IHC Member 1357 |
Dial | |||
|
IHC Member 1357 |
S/N | |||
|
IHC Member 1357 |
Case back | |||
|
IHC Life Member |
Roger, are you saying that it is a box set also? Those hands would be correct for that year railroad 992L. I have a 992 1st model with a Roman Numeral dial that is era correct, but have no Idea if it goes with the movement as it is not a box set. The Serial is #726071. Regards, Larry | |||
|
IHC Member 1357 |
I wish it were Larry!! No box with this one. I only added it to this thread because it is not a common combination. Just as the one Richard posted above which is a boxed set and apparently an original combination. Can't say if mine is original or not but it is the only one I have seen and all the numbers make sense. I wonder what the A.R.E. for the dial stands for? | |||
|
IHC Life Member |
OH, I didn't realize that you were talking about his box set. I have been looking at it and I just cannot figure what it stands for either. I want to lean toward "ROMAN" for the R of course, but just cannot put anything together. When I get a chance to pull mine out tomorrow I'll post a picture of it also. Regards, Larry | |||
|
Roger and Larry, I have an old Hamilton catalog and it describes an illustration of the dial on the boxed set as, "Antique Roman." The dial Roger posted matches an illustration described as, "Strong Roman." There's another listing, "Light Roman" but there isn't an illustration of what it looks like. RR | ||||
|
IHC Member 1357 |
Thanks Richard. I can see now that my dial is different from the one you posted as mine looks like a radial dial. Perhaps when Larry posts his it will be the third variant you mentioned here. Roger | |||
|
IHC Member 1291 |
I believe it stood for " Antique Roman Enamel " regards, bb | |||
|
IHC Life Member |
Sorry it took me so long, but here are the pictures. As you can see this one is much older, Serial #726071 = 1908 but I believe the 4 foot dial is era correct to the movement. | |||
|
IHC Life Member |
The movement | |||
|
IHC Member 1357 |
Thanks Larry,for posting the pics. I have the same configuration dial as you posted other than it is single sunk. I have some 992's that are older than yours and none of them have the Roman numeral dials on them. Yours is certainly era correct and being double sunk makes me think it could possibly be original to the movement. Roger | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Your request is being processed... |