WWT Shows | CLICK TO: Join and Support Internet Horology Club 185™ | IHC185™ Forums |
![]() |
• Check Out Our... • • TWO Book Offer! • |
Go ![]() | New Topic ![]() | Find-Or-Search ![]() | Notify ![]() | Tools ![]() | Reply to Post ![]() | ![]() |
IHC Life Member |
I'm looking at a Hamilton script dial very much like the one cited as pre-1920's in the "Hamilton 992, 992E, and 992B Case & Dial Identification, *(1924-1971)" thread - but without the red 5-min numbers. Black and white only, just hour numbers. Looks pristine. Is this a known reproduction? If not, can anyone identify it? In the alternative, can anyone point me at a resource to check? The dial isn't in Shugart, and I can't find it here (probably my fault). Kenneth Sloan | ||
|
![]() |
? ![]() | |||
|
IHC Life Member |
That's the one. Kenneth Sloan | |||
|
![]() |
Mr. Sloan, The dial in question is a genuine Hamilton dial. Dials have variations which are often subtle and hard to describe. Hence it’s always a good idea to post a picture. This particular dial is signed Hamilton in block letters and not script. It is a #530 DS Breguet Arabic according to page 11 in a 1920 Hamilton Watch Material catalog that I don't think can be found on this website. Signatures are a good way to approximately date dials but details can more accurately determine dates. In order to learn more refer to: Hamilton Railroad Porcelain Dials Below is an illustration showing the differences between script ( green ) and block ( blue ) signatures. ![]() | |||
|
![]() |
Notice on #436 dials how the earlier dial has a different seconds bit and the five minute marker numbers go radially around the dial and the 30 is upside down. All three dials are #436 but they all belong on different time period movements. ![]() | |||
|
![]() |
That #530 is a nice looking dial. The only noticeable flaw I see is a hairline by the number 10 which reduces it's value. If possible a photo of the back of the dial is always good especially if it's suspected of being a reproduction. RR ![]() | |||
|
IHC Life Member |
Sorry - my eyes played tricks on me - I could have sworn it was a script Hamilton - thanks for the info, and my apologies for the error. Kenneth Sloan | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
![]() | Your request is being processed... |
|