They were manufactured circa 1960 by the Record watch company of Tramelan, Switzerland, they made a Grade 435, 435B, and a Grade 435C. The 435 was a 17 jewel Commercial grade for bus drivers, and others who are not subject to railway watch inspection rules. and the 435B, 435C were railway approved. The 435B was equipped with Incabloc shock protection jeweling for the balance wheel, and Kif or Duafix shock protection jeweling for the pallet and escape wheel arbors, while the 435C was equipped with just Incabloc shock protection jeweling for the balance staff, These watches were made for the Canadian market, and may also have been used in Mexico.
Larry
A Ball Record 435 COMMERCIAL dial.
Posts: 3370 | Location: Okotoks Alberta Canada | Registered: November 22, 2002
Here is a photo of a Ball Record 435C movement. Notice the pallet, and escape wheel have conventional jeweling. [Compare carefully to close-up of shock resistant devices on 435B above.]
Larry
Posts: 3370 | Location: Okotoks Alberta Canada | Registered: November 22, 2002
Larry,thanks very much for the info.as I have none on this watch.I"won"it in a auction and as of now I don't have it.Should be here next week.I am really looking forward to receiving it as it will be my first Ball. Regards Roger
Posts: 4094 | Location: Carbon, Texas in the USA | Registered: January 24, 2010
Roger, Hope yours turns out to be as nice as the ones Larry showed!I also asked about these Record Ball watches on the Ball forum ,like you said, there isn't too much info on them.I don't yet have any Ball watches either, they're all way out of my reach.I always thought I'd be able get one of these Swiss ones, but even these go for an arm and a leg today.They are a nice watch!...Ted.
Posts: 1323 | Location: Lebanon, Connecticut USA | Registered: March 28, 2008
Well,I got the watch a couple of days ago.Was surprised it is in a Ball case.Is that normal?It is missing the regulator whip and the seconds hand is a little long.Overall pretty nice and ran for 42hrs. about 5 seconds off of my computer.Any comments good or bad would be appreciated. Roger
Posts: 4094 | Location: Carbon, Texas in the USA | Registered: January 24, 2010
Thanks for the nice comments guys.I am pretty pleased with it with the exceptions of the bow and regulator whip.Anyone have any ideas as where to look for these parts? Regards Roger Oh,by the way Larry your pics.are stunning what kind of camera do you use?
Posts: 4094 | Location: Carbon, Texas in the USA | Registered: January 24, 2010
Stirrup bows will appear from time to time, they generally will be a recast in 10K. They are close to the originals and generally will cost $50-100 each. The whiplash springs will generally only be found on a parts watch and will cost whatever the high bidder allows !! Near to impossible to find and cost prohibitive unless you have a $1000 + watch. Sorry for the bad news.
Parts are becoming so hard to find especially for the Ball watches as well as the higher graded watches. The rest of the manufacturers are still to be found with patience. However it will always be best to purchase complete watches with all of their parts still attached. The going rate for whiplash springs on about all the brands are $25 and up. Finding correct bows are a hit and miss affair but will generally run $25 and up also, but are hard to find especially for Hamilton, Ball, Illinois and some of the Elgins. Wrong dial? Deduct what the correct dial will cost from what you can recoup by reselling the incorrect dial for.
Remembering that when buying watches will cause less frustrations unless you have the missing part[s] in hand. But if one has to have that watch [and sometimes we just have to have it], try and deduct $50 from what you were willing to initially pay. If you are outbid on that account, you can thank your lucky stars for the most part. Correct watches with all their original parts are out there and that is what one should be looking for. You will be $$$$ ahead. Hope that is some help.
regards, bb
Posts: 6376 | Location: Texas in the USA | Registered: July 27, 2009
Buster,I know you are right but I just had to have this one and the price was right. Larry just noticed your watch is s/n 2435 and mine is 2429.So I guess mine is older than yours Roger
Posts: 4094 | Location: Carbon, Texas in the USA | Registered: January 24, 2010
Great observation I didn't notice they were six serial numbers apart.
Here are some photos of my camera and close-up set up I use to take my pocket watch photos, the first shows my light tent and auxiliary lighting I have two bulbs in the box underneath the tent, two sidelights, and one overhead light.
Larry
Posts: 3370 | Location: Okotoks Alberta Canada | Registered: November 22, 2002