May 17, 2011, 20:46
David AbbeUnusual Charles V. Woerd's 18k Pocket Watch?
It was another attempt to compensate "mid-range temperature error" which it did not. With a serrated Balance wheel they are impossible to adjust but with the "normal" balance wheel, they are reported to run pretty well.
Finally, the use of nearly "0 coefficient of expansion" (el)Invar developed originally for glass to metal sealing Vacuum Radio Tube base Pins "won the day" for minimizing temperature error . . . with 0 temp coefficient, compensation was not an issue.
May 17, 2011, 22:00
Eric UnseltI can see how the temperature-stable Invar alloy simplified things, but I'm still not getting the serrated thing.
Unless it's got to do with wind-resistance(

), I'm not sure how a bi-metallic unserrated wheel would differ from a serrated one.
May 17, 2011, 23:53
Tom BrownMaybe his patent will answer the questions;
http://www.google.com/patents?...#v=onepage&q&f=falseMay 18, 2011, 11:45
Jerry KingThanks Tom, that bit of detail clears up some things for me anyway....
Regards,
Jerry
May 18, 2011, 16:45
Bud MellessHi Sean;
Would you be interested in selling that watch, in a running condition, with that case?
If so, then I'd like to hear from you.
Bud
quote:
Here is another view showing the "Sparkle of the plates"
May 18, 2011, 18:42
Eric UnseltThanks, Tom. I didn't realize the serrations were on the mating surfaces. How the %#&@ would you machine such a thing anyway?