The puzzling thing is that most of my prototype 3D designs have been made on "3D Printers" since about 1995. Where this is going now is (I Guess) with the larger "Macro" stuff.
We were printing complete mechanical sets then, but most of it was within a 6" x 8" x 12" Space.
Small watch parts is a good application as they can be done quickly. Then there is photo-etch . . . VERY Lo-Cost.
Posts: 6492 | Location: Southern California in the USA | Registered: July 19, 2007
photo etching is no cost effective if you have to do one part and can't be done at your place(home) 3d printers are being less expensive and are making it way to average Joe's home.
Posts: 4395 | Location: Arizona in the USA | Registered: July 23, 2011
I SUSPECT THAT IF WE WORKED UP THE ARTWORK, WE COULD MAKE A SINGLE PHOTOETCH NEGATIVE (MUCH LIKE THE "ASCENT" WOODEN CLOCK KITS OR LASER-CUTTING) PROGRAM THAT COULD MAKE A COMPLETE WATCH PARTS WHEEL TRAIN, SPRINGS, HANDS SET. THE STAFFS WOULD HAVE TO BE MADE FROM WIRE CONVENTIONALLY.
ADD STAFFS AND A 3D CASE AND WE COULD HAVE AN IHC185 "CLUB" WATCH.
Posts: 6492 | Location: Southern California in the USA | Registered: July 19, 2007
I run a small 3D Printing Lab. We do mostly ABS, and consider 1mm the minimum feature size. For mainstream "3D printing", watch parts are just beyond reach. I did have a student make a very credible *clock* a few years ago.
Kenneth Sloan
Posts: 222 | Location: Alabama in the USA | Registered: February 01, 2014