I just received a particularly interesting Elgin 16s BWR. Very worn out looking, would be scorned by many of the "collectors" I know, "cause it's just too wore out looking". . .
Posts: 6492 | Location: Southern California in the USA | Registered: July 19, 2007
As with all watches that are still running, I put it on Mumford, and it has 1.0 - 1.6 ms beat error . . . Hmmm pretty good, timing error . . . +/-0.2 - 1.6 sec/day! So I open up the well brassed-out back case cover . .
Posts: 6492 | Location: Southern California in the USA | Registered: July 19, 2007
. . . and lo and behold there is a nice looking movement, good motion, but I knew that from Mumford, but what is all that stuff on the inside back cover?
Posts: 6492 | Location: Southern California in the USA | Registered: July 19, 2007
So here's a watch I love that's "too worn out to be a collectable" . . . I love it! It has a whole lifetime of Railroad stories to tell. It's owner loved it too as he carried it all through his career as a Railman. Now I feel only qualified to be it's caretaker, not owner, not "collector"! This watch already has a rightful owner, who after carrying this from 1922 through the WWII and afterwards, has passed this on and so it has found its way to me to care for it as homage to the owner's contributions to our lives and country. I am proud to do that. It has many other "tired old friends" here to keep it company.
Posts: 6492 | Location: Southern California in the USA | Registered: July 19, 2007
Those I call the "Watch-Snobs" would have none of it, but there's a lot of watch there and quite a history of faithful service. You are to be commended for seeing the potential and bringing it back to life.
Thank for sharing it with us!
Lindell
Posts: 10553 | Location: Northeastern Ohio in the USA | Registered: November 19, 2002
Thank you for understanding. I hope there are more who share this feeling about some parts of our "collections". In researching this s/n25595842 watch all things fall together better for the significant details I noticed. This is the first run of 21,000 s/n's assigned to Grade 472 Elgin watches marked "Invar Balance" on the dial! I also confirmed the strangely cut Balance wheel which by virtue of the invar material has the cut made well away from the cross arm affording less temperature compensation needed for the Invar wheel material. The carbon dust soaked dial, is therefore original to the movement, and surely the case is too with the RR service markings. I may clean and renovate the dial some for simple appearance's sake. Further, the watchmaker who "usually" worked on this piece must have been a real master, as the watch to this day is running so accurately and with the regulator still set in the middle of the adjustment range. That makes me almost fearful to touch it for purposes of cleaning. I expect the more recent services used a very good lube like 56b or equivalent, as otherwise it would not be running at all.
Posts: 6492 | Location: Southern California in the USA | Registered: July 19, 2007
Dave, This is exactly the reason that I enjoy handling and repairing these kind of watches. studying the "character" is what I do when I first receive a watch, even if I don't know the story behind it.
Thanks for this story, Joel
Posts: 21 | Location: Chico, California in the USA | Registered: July 11, 2007
hi it would be so cool if these old watches could talk and tell who they have been with and where theve been.and as far as the care taker thing it is said by philippe stern you never actually own a patek philippe,you merely look after it for the next generation.i think this is true for all old watches.
Posts: 279 | Location: Wheatridge, Colorado in the USA | Registered: January 20, 2008
Wow, I'm in the right place. I'm "caring" for a couple of watches now. I Ebayed a 19j BWR, very good condition. The seller neglected to verify that the pictures displayed. I even offered to amend the price, which I thought obscenely low. The seller would have none of it, said I should enjoy the watch. I do. Almost the same situation with a 972, great shape. I chalk it up to beginners luck. But an elite collector probably wouldn't bend to pickup either one. Really sad, this goes so far beyond money. Its our heritage, and we must protect and cherish it. Can you imagine the surprise a European collector must feel the first time, looking at the fine detail of one of these beautiful little machines? Maybe I better stop right here..
If this really is legit, has anyone updated the Elgin database before? It has this 571 listed as A5P or A6P. Nine adjustments? Not even when I was young!