WWT Shows CLICK TO: Join and Support Internet Horology Club 185™ IHC185™ Forums

• Check Out Our... •
• TWO Book Offer! •
Go
New Topic
Find-Or-Search
Notify
Tools
Reply to Post
  
need help with this 992... "Click" to Login or Register 
posted
Hello group,
I will be attending a antique auction tomorrow & this watch is listed. A 992B with the original box. I am not familar with the dial on this watch. It is a single sunk dial, but I can not make out what it says. Is it a traffic special? I thought they were Swiss. It has a nice BOC #2 case. I have not seen this box before either. I'm confused...
Any thoughts? Thanks, Jim

 
Posts: 273 | Location: New York in the USA | Registered: May 28, 2008
IHC Life Member
Picture of David Abbe
posted
James, a simple thing to check, if the box is actually for the watch it will have an old penned serial number marked on it that matches that of the watch. I will leave it to the Hamilton experts to advise you of the dial and box details.
 
Posts: 6492 | Location: Southern California in the USA | Registered: July 19, 2007
IHC Life Member
Site Moderator

Picture of Tom Brown
posted
James

I can't really add to David's comment.

It looks like the dial says Railway Special.

You might check this link to a bunch of examples posted in case you don't get a reply before you go to the auction.

One other thing, I think the watch movement will be a 992B but the box in your photo says 992.

https://ihc185.infopop.cc/eve/f...4108073/m/7601094112

Tom
 
Posts: 5107 | Location: New Mexico in the USA | Registered: January 27, 2007
IHC President
Life Member
Picture of Lindell V. Riddle
posted

Jim,

Assuming the dial to be original to the movement and using it as a beginning point, that is a very late 1940s through early 1950s number 168 melamine dial. Single-Sunk melamine dials like this were used for only a short period and the design is unmistakable. Follow Tom's link to several other 992B examples with dials identical to this one. The case is a late design Hamilton Case Model 2 and the ebony hands also point to that same era. This watch will most probably turn out to be a correct 992B from all we can see.

Now to the box, it is of circa 1930 design predating the watch by a score of years and therefore not related to this particular watch in any way. I would base my bid solely on the watch and see the box as something that although having some value in its own right it merely comes along for the ride. David is correct that this box originally was marked with a description of the watch that came in it. Look to see if it is defaced to disguise that fact or perhaps falsified to have some bogus reference to the watch.

Use caution and do not be misled by that "N.O.S." stuff.

Hope this is of help to you.

Lindell

Wink
 
Posts: 10553 | Location: Northeastern Ohio in the USA | Registered: November 19, 2002
posted
Thanks Lindell & Tom,
Thanks for the info! I always use caution when buying at auction. How do I price this compared to a "regular" 992B? Seeing that this dial was used for a short period, are they more valuable compared to the double sunk? To me, melamine was a little bit of a negative. Is this a desirable dial? Lindell, how can one tell that this is a "late" design #2 case? Thanks again, Jim
 
Posts: 273 | Location: New York in the USA | Registered: May 28, 2008
IHC President
Life Member
Picture of Lindell V. Riddle
posted

Jim,

Glad we could be of help my friend.

This is as "regular" a 992B as you're likely to find. The style number 168 dial is simply one of several available at that time. Many collectors prefer a Double-Sunk design, still others want a marginal minutes or Montgomery dial. The most serious collectors want one of each. I would neither add or deduct for this one. Always remember that all Hamilton 992B dials from 1949-50 until the final post-production examples in 1970 were melamine. To be authentic these later watches must front a melamine dial.

I mentioned the short period that style dial was available to explain how I arrived at my impression about the watch most likely being original and therefore not related to what would then be a considerably older box. Follow the link Tom provided and you will see the lowest price for a 992B in Gold-Filled Case at this time was $71.50 and Ed shows examples of that price tag as well as verification of correct number ranges.

Based upon that, expect this movement to be numbered in approximately the C200000 through C375000 range and the case to be something like J0075000 through J375000 if the combination is original. But again don't accept that New-Old-Stock line because to be N.O.S. the original box or boxes must be there as well. Someone thought they could put that unrelated box with it and pass it off so that means you sharpen your senses and examine everything about this one even more carefully.

Later Case Model 2 after the 1920s have the plain shoulders and by the late 1940s have the less distinct pendant markings both seen on this case, but look for a "J-prefix" on the case number as indicated above

Have fun at the auction and show us what you bring home.

Lindell

Wink
 
Posts: 10553 | Location: Northeastern Ohio in the USA | Registered: November 19, 2002
IHC Vice President
Pitfalls Moderator
IHC Life Member
Picture of Edward L. Parsons, Jr.
posted
Well said Lin. I concur with all your findings.

The misrepresented box is a red flag, so James should be on his guard & look over all the details VERY CAREFULLY.


Best Regards,

Ed
 
Posts: 6696 | Location: Southwestern Pennsylvania, USA | Registered: April 19, 2004
posted
Thanks guys! very helpful... As they say "I did not just fall off the turnip truck". I will go over it the same as I do every watch. There is also what appears to be a Ball/Hamilton 21j 999 & some others. Also some wristwatches including one 14k Omega. There is one watch there that I have never owned & I was wondering what the market might be. It is a 21j Prince of Wales Plymouth Watch Co. (Rockford). It's a two star watch but that does not mean it's valuable. Shugart's say's $300-700. Any truth to that? Well I am off to the preview to give them a real good once over. The auction is this evening. I will post the outcome of the sale & any photos if I pick up anything.. Best, Jim

 
Posts: 273 | Location: New York in the USA | Registered: May 28, 2008
posted
21j Ball

 
Posts: 273 | Location: New York in the USA | Registered: May 28, 2008
posted
Just got back from the preview. The Hamilton is really nice & shows very little signs of any wear. The movement has never seen a tool & is near mint, as is the dial. The case back still retains it's original brush marks & no jeweler's mark's inside the case. The serial number is C389262 & the case #J386330. The 1930's box has no watch info. There is no label attached. The Plymouth & Ball are both nice watches too. We'll see what happens....
 
Posts: 273 | Location: New York in the USA | Registered: May 28, 2008
IHC Life Member
Picture of David Abbe
posted
As for the Prince of Wales watch, according to Roy Ehrhardts book, there were 650 made as Grade 101S which Rockford W. Co. "burped out" in 50 - 100 piece lots for sales by Sears as Plymouth Watch Co., "Prince of Wales" models.

If you can get one that one for anything close to the $300.00 Shugart book estimate, you stole it!
 
Posts: 6492 | Location: Southern California in the USA | Registered: July 19, 2007
IHC Life Member
Moderator
Picture of Donald Trumble
posted
James,

I like the way Lindell explained the precautions on the 992B you asked about, good explanation.

David is right, there should be plenty of interest in the 'Prince if Wales' from Rockford and that Ball also looks like a good one.

We all look forward to your report.

Don
 
Posts: 504 | Location: Pennsylvania in the USA | Registered: April 02, 2005
posted
Good morning group,
I ended up buying the 992B, the Prince of Wales & the Ball. I also bought a 12s Howard & a Hamilton 910 in it's box. The Rockford is very impressive. The 992B looks like it was never worn. Movt. is mint & has never had a tool taken to it. They are all in excellent condition. I think I'm pleased. I'll post photos shortly. Thanks for all the help... Jim
 
Posts: 273 | Location: New York in the USA | Registered: May 28, 2008
posted
Here is the Prince of Wales

 
Posts: 273 | Location: New York in the USA | Registered: May 28, 2008
posted
another view

 
Posts: 273 | Location: New York in the USA | Registered: May 28, 2008
posted
Nice engine turned case

 
Posts: 273 | Location: New York in the USA | Registered: May 28, 2008
posted
B&B 20 year case. Looks original to the watch.

 
Posts: 273 | Location: New York in the USA | Registered: May 28, 2008
posted
Beautiful damaskeened movement.

 
Posts: 273 | Location: New York in the USA | Registered: May 28, 2008
posted
Close up of movt.

 
Posts: 273 | Location: New York in the USA | Registered: May 28, 2008
posted
the 992B

 
Posts: 273 | Location: New York in the USA | Registered: May 28, 2008
posted
side view

 
Posts: 273 | Location: New York in the USA | Registered: May 28, 2008
posted
orig. brush marks

 
Posts: 273 | Location: New York in the USA | Registered: May 28, 2008
posted
No jewelers marks

 
Posts: 273 | Location: New York in the USA | Registered: May 28, 2008
posted
Very nice!

 
Posts: 273 | Location: New York in the USA | Registered: May 28, 2008
posted
As nice as you will find

 
Posts: 273 | Location: New York in the USA | Registered: May 28, 2008
IHC Life Member
Site Moderator

Picture of Tom Brown
posted
Hi James

Glad you did so well, those look nice, I would like to see the Ball too.

Tom
 
Posts: 5107 | Location: New Mexico in the USA | Registered: January 27, 2007
posted
Thanks Tom. Photos of the Ball will be coming soon.
 
Posts: 273 | Location: New York in the USA | Registered: May 28, 2008
posted
Your camera work is among the best, Jim. I especially like the Rockford.

Eric
 
Posts: 2962 | Location: Western New York in the USA | Registered: March 24, 2008
IHC Life Member

Picture of Jerry King
posted
Some great looking watches, James....It really pays to be in the right place at the right time.... Big Grin

Thanks for showing them....

Regards,
Jerry
 
Posts: 2828 | Location: California in the USA | Registered: June 23, 2008
IHC Vice President
Pitfalls Moderator
IHC Life Member
Picture of Edward L. Parsons, Jr.
posted
Congrats Jim, looks like you snagged some winners!


Best Regards,

Ed
 
Posts: 6696 | Location: Southwestern Pennsylvania, USA | Registered: April 19, 2004
IHC Life Member
Picture of David Abbe
posted
Beautiful recovery work and pictures Jim. That model 6/7 Rockford is sooooo close in appearance to a a Model 9 Elgin. Incredible what a few small changes in plate cuts will do to the styling of a watch!
 
Posts: 6492 | Location: Southern California in the USA | Registered: July 19, 2007
IHC President
Life Member
Picture of Lindell V. Riddle
posted

That "Prince of Wales" is the nicest Cool I have ever seen!

Lindell

Wink
 
Posts: 10553 | Location: Northeastern Ohio in the USA | Registered: November 19, 2002
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


©2002-2023 Internet Horology Club 185™ - Lindell V. Riddle President - All Rights Reserved Worldwide

Internet Horology Club 185™ is the "Family-Friendly" place for Watch and Clock Collectors