Recently I saw an auction on ebay and the seller said they could not get the back off and that the watch didn't run or set. I looked at the pictures and saw a Hampden double sunk dial and thought, hmm with the lettering style and the fact it is a double sunk I would think at the least it is a 17j watch. The case was a silveroid and wasn't beat into submission, the dial looked ok but did have some hairlines and the hands were all there and looked good. So it arrived today, I then got some good packing tape to wrap around my hands, got the bezel to give a little (swing out case) and got the bezel off and pulled the pendant up so I could look at the movement. Well I was correct it did have 17 jewels, plus 6 more It was a nice, clean New Railway adj5p 23 jewel movement. The balance swings nicely but the mainspring is toast. Price of this bad boy, $51+shipping!!!! Thank goodness for gummy bezels!!!!
Posts: 1797 | Location: Michigan in the USA | Registered: September 19, 2009
Don't you just love it. I was at a gun show and this guy had a key wind - key set waltham and said I want $300 for the watch but you can,t open it cause the last guy that did it cost me $75. to get it running. So I said I have a colt gun behind my back how much will you pay. He finally figured how stupid it was to try to sell something that you can really see. I Stuck out it was not a civil war era Waltham.
Posts: 3326 | Location: Illinois in the USA | Registered: July 06, 2010
Thanks Ted, my first one cost me a lot more, but it is always nice to get lucky like I was with this one. Even if it was only a 17j movement it was still worth $57, but I was surprised that many collectors passed it by.
Posts: 1797 | Location: Michigan in the USA | Registered: September 19, 2009
Mike it it had turned out to be a 7j or something I figured I could sell the hands for about $10, the dial $15-25, and the case for $20-30 and have a parts movement if needed. I got lucky, well very lucky, These full plate Hampden 23j movements are nice, the other one I have was made in 1907, this one 1908 and both are marked adjusted to 5 positions. If it had been a single sunk I doubt that I would have jumped on it.
Posts: 1797 | Location: Michigan in the USA | Registered: September 19, 2009
I also lucked out on a recent gamble. I spotted a 10-size Lord Elgin in what looked like very good condition, including the original box and papers, advertised as gold-filled. The photos were terrible and there were no photos of the case markings, but I thought the style of case was one that was only made in solid gold. So I bought the "gold-filled" watch for $99. It is solid 14k gold.
Posts: 1414 | Location: Pasadena, California USA | Registered: November 11, 2005
Ethan I have purchase more than one watch with "fuzzy" pictures based on a hunch, and have done better more often than I have been bitten. It takes a little effort to scroll though all the listings and a bit of knowledge/research to see the pearls in with the swine. Normally I don't collect many 10/12s watches but I have a few, ands still have the one I got won from you, that one is a very elegant watch. And feel free to toss up some pics of the one you won.
Posts: 1797 | Location: Michigan in the USA | Registered: September 19, 2009