February 09, 2006, 18:47
James Greg WooldridgeHow scarce is this Waltham dial?
How scarce is this Waltham dial?
I just purchased this watch. The dial is perfect. Grimy, but perfect. It is a Monty wind-indicator. I haven't seen too many of these. In fact, I am having a difficult time finding much info at all. It is attached to a 23J 16s Vanguard. Any help appreciated.
Thanks!
February 09, 2006, 20:04
Frank KusumotoNo info except that I've fixed a 21j Crescent St. with the exact same dial. Another question: Where is the wind indicator supposed to be pointing when the watch is completely wound, and then again where does it point when the watch is completely wound down.
Frank "407" Kusumoto
February 09, 2006, 22:33
Denny IwenMy pick would be pointing at the 0 at the up position when fully wound.
James, nice dial, I think it is very rare to find a dial in this condition on waltham indicators any more.
Denny
February 09, 2006, 23:33
Cort Moore"Assuming Jim's dial to be porcelain-enamel I'd think it would be very desirable".
I agree with Lindell 100%. Some details I see make me doubt this dial. For instance, the up/down hand seems poorly framed by lines on the dial. It also appears a bit too flat in the photo to be double sunk. This is just my observation of course. A pic of the back of the dial would solve the matter quickly.
-Cort
February 10, 2006, 01:04
Ethan LipsigI have Waltham Vanguard with a very similar dial, except that it also says "Vanguard 23 Jewels" and has a slightly different wind indicator dial. The wind indicator dial is sunk just like the seconds dial is sunk, but the dial has a black circle inside the hours chapter to imitate the usual double sunk dial. I am attaching a poor picture.
February 10, 2006, 01:05
Ethan LipsigI should add that, since taking the picture, I had had the up/down indicator adjusted so that it is right on the zero when the watch is fully wound.
February 10, 2006, 08:48
James Greg WooldridgeThanks for the comments, everyone. The dial is most definately enamel and has no outwardly signs of an authenticity issue. I should have time to take it off and photograph the back tonight.
February 10, 2006, 12:21
Mark CrossIt's not that obvious, Lindell, as we're used to seeing our current counters in a count down set up...so it's easy to confuse direction. I know unless I think about it for a minute, I'd think if it's near zero, the watch was almost wound down (zero power left in the spring), where in the description above, you're saying it's fully wound at zero, and it's showing how many hours it's run as it progresses.

Regards! Mark
February 10, 2006, 19:14
James Greg WooldridgeHere is a photo of the back of the dial to answer an earlier question. Any concerns?
February 11, 2006, 10:41
Sheila GilbertJames,
You have an outstanding watch there.
Very unusual dial too, Congratulations!
Looks Perfect to me.