WWT Shows | CLICK TO: Join and Support Internet Horology Club 185™ | IHC185™ Forums |
• Check Out Our... • • TWO Book Offer! • |
Go | New Topic | Find-Or-Search | Notify | Tools | Reply to Post |
This must have been popular in the days past. I have seen a few marked 21 Jewels and the style is always the same. Crooked marketing? Aaron | |||
|
Crooked aftermarketing I would think! Kenny | ||||
|
| ||||
|
Watch Repair Expert |
Of course, no one knows when the "21 Jewels" marking was added to the watch above, but very clearly it is not an original factory mark. Assuming that such a mark was made while the company that made the watch was still in business, however, my guess would be that the company wouldn't have been very happy about it. By way of illustration, I'll relate a brief story from my early experiences. The old guy who taught me how to work on watches, had in his shop a plethora of "parts movements," which are what watchmakers use as their private stock of hard-to-find parts. As I was looking through the various movements one day, I happened across a Rockford "dome model" which was marked "17 Jewels," much in the same way the watch above is marked "21." When I asked the old guy about it, he told me that when times got hard at Rockford, shortly before they went out of business, they marked a lot of their watches with higher jewel counts than they really had. At the time, I just accepted that explanation, and filed it away as an interesting obscure fact. Once I learned a bit more about watches, however, it eventually dawned on me that the "dome models" were Rockfords first attempt to produce 16s watches, and they were introduced more than 30 years before the company went out of business. Obviously, that conflicted with the explanation I'd been given, but when I mentioned that to the old guy, his opinion was unchanged. He never liked Rockfords because of that one erroneous idea about them, and to this day, I don't know where he got it. In any event, marks like the one above were clearly added by unscrupulous dealers, not by ANY American watch company. Although movements so marked are clearly "defaced," they still make for something of an interesting horological curiosity in my opinion, if nothing else but to illustrate that fraud and deception in the watch business are not modern innovations. =================== Steve Maddox Past President, NAWCC Chapter #62 North Little Rock, Arkansas IHC Charter Member 49 | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Your request is being processed... |