WWT Shows CLICK TO: Join and Support Internet Horology Club 185™ IHC185™ Forums

• Check Out Our... •
• TWO Book Offer! •
Go
New Topic
Find-Or-Search
Notify
Tools
Reply to Post
  
Questions about this Ball/Waltham 21j. "Click" to Login or Register 
Picture of Paul Adams
posted
My Biggest "Habit" is Ball/Hamilton with Hamilton's being my Second Collectible. However, I have at least one of all of the 16s Ball Hamilton Models, and I had a couple of "stray" Ball/Waltham's so I decided to add a total of three 16s. Ball Walthams. Having two 19 Jewel watches acquired along the years, I just got this 21 Jewel Model 16s. yesterday. Now I only need a 17 Jewel 16s Waltham.

Front View
 
Posts: 181 | Location: Salt Lake City, Utah in the USA | Registered: January 27, 2008
Picture of Paul Adams
posted
As you can see, the Dial is an Un-Common one. But, I actually know little about the Waltham Manufactured Ball Watches. So, Anything Anyone can tell me about this watch would be Appreciated. It is Serial No. B 253144. I tried to find its year of Manufacture but ended up with somewhere between 1911 and 1919. Anybody able to Pin this down Closer?

 
Posts: 181 | Location: Salt Lake City, Utah in the USA | Registered: January 27, 2008
posted
Paul, I would say, that's a Great Habit to have !
 
Posts: 352 | Location: Southeast Michigan in the USA | Registered: March 22, 2012
Picture of Paul Adams
posted
I believe this Case originally had a "Stirrup" Bow and appears to be a "20th Century Model," but as you can see, the Bow has been changed to a generic one at sometime in the past. The Rest of the Watch appears like it might be Original. Anybody able to confirm this or point out other problems?

 
Posts: 181 | Location: Salt Lake City, Utah in the USA | Registered: January 27, 2008
Picture of Paul Adams
posted
Movement is supposed to have had a COA a couple of months ago. Runs Strong, is Clean and is only off a few seconds in the last 24 hours. I will time it shortly, but I am happy with its performance for now. Here's the Inside of the Back Cover.

 
Posts: 181 | Location: Salt Lake City, Utah in the USA | Registered: January 27, 2008
Picture of Paul Adams
posted
I do have a "NOS" Stirrup Bow in my Parts Horde but I'm questioning whether to attempt to install it. I'm not sure what might be messed up in the stem to have the "ugly" replacement it has now.

 
Posts: 181 | Location: Salt Lake City, Utah in the USA | Registered: January 27, 2008
Picture of Paul Adams
posted
Yeah, Jack, "old men" like me develop habits! It does seem to me that "Girls" were better in many ways, and might have even been Slightly Cheaper. Oh, the Good Old Days!

Hope everybody checks out this watch and gives me suggestions to make sure it is as "Original" in appearance as possible. Suggestions Welcomed!
 
Posts: 181 | Location: Salt Lake City, Utah in the USA | Registered: January 27, 2008
IHC Member 665
posted
Paul

Your watch has a very nice Ball ORRS wavy numeral dial, but I suggest that the dial predates the watch by at least ten years and, therefore, that the dial is probably not original to the movement. Those dials are usually seen on Ball-Waltham watches dating from the first two or three years of production.

I think that your watch should have a gothic numeral dial with large dots for five-minute markers.

I have identified eleven distinct designs of Ball-Waltham ORRS dial, of which your dial is, chronologically, of the third type.

Brotherhood and Commercial Standard dials are additional, so the subject of Ball-Waltham dials is quite extensive.

JBS
 
Posts: 215 | Location: East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia | Registered: December 31, 2005
Picture of Paul Adams
posted
Thanks, John. I felt this dial might be older than the watch, but I am definitely NOT versed in Ball/Waltham dials. Ball/Hamilton in 16 size have only a few variations and are easy to sort out, in my opinion.

Do you know about which years this dial would have been used? Thanks again!
 
Posts: 181 | Location: Salt Lake City, Utah in the USA | Registered: January 27, 2008
IHC Member 665
posted
Remembering that hard and fast rules do not exist for Ball watches, there is no definite answer. However, I doubt whether your dial would be correct for the first run of Ball-Waltham ORRS watches (B060701 to B061100), notionally of 1899. I would expect your dial to appear on watches notionally from 1901 and 1902 from the 2nd to 18th runs of Ball-Waltham ORRS watches (before the 200000 serial numbers began). I do not think any Brotherhood dials had wavy numerals (but some Commercial Standard dials did).
 
Posts: 215 | Location: East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia | Registered: December 31, 2005
Picture of Paul Adams
posted
Thanks again, John for answering more questions about this watch. Anything else you can talk about is also encouraged. I have minor knowledge about Ball/Waltham watches so anything is appreciated.
 
Posts: 181 | Location: Salt Lake City, Utah in the USA | Registered: January 27, 2008
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


©2002-2023 Internet Horology Club 185™ - Lindell V. Riddle President - All Rights Reserved Worldwide

Internet Horology Club 185™ is the "Family-Friendly" place for Watch and Clock Collectors