WWT Shows CLICK TO: Join and Support Internet Horology Club 185™ IHC185™ Forums

• Check Out Our... •
• TWO Book Offer! •
Go
New Topic
Find-Or-Search
Notify
Tools
Reply to Post
  
992E "Click" to Login or Register 
posted
I came across a 992E #2606551 in a base metal Defiance case. Don't jump on me too hard, but I switched the movment into a #10 Hamilton case. I think that the movement dates to 1936-37, and that the #10 cases were available in 1936. The dial is marked Hamilton only, and the numbers style is the same as is used on the Hamilton Montgomery dials of that era, but is not a Montgomery dial. This type of dial was shown in Hamilton's ads as late as 1934. Did I get the combination right, or have I created a Frankenwatch?
 
Posts: 767 | Location: Los Osos, California USA | Registered: December 12, 2002
IHC President
Life Member
Picture of Lindell V. Riddle
posted

Jerry,

Your dial also sounds right. If I understand your description correctly that is the "BM" or "Blind-Man's Dial" as shown on left side in the image below this posting.

On the case, some are strong on keeping everything in "as-found" but like you, I would have made the change. Think of it this way, you buy a collector car that someone installed bucket seats from another make and put a scoop on the hood but you want it as close as you can get it to being the way it originally came. So you find a proper interior, the right hood and other correct components. Now, you have the real-deal. To me restoring authenticity is the way to go.

To my mind you made a real improvement.

Let's see what others say.

Lindell

Wink


Is your dial like the one on the left below?


 
Posts: 10553 | Location: Northeastern Ohio in the USA | Registered: November 19, 2002
IHC Vice President
Pitfalls Moderator
IHC Life Member
Picture of Edward L. Parsons, Jr.
posted
By restoring the watch to a correct configuration, as it might have been originally sold, you made a definite improvement.


Best Regards,

Ed
 
Posts: 6696 | Location: Southwestern Pennsylvania, USA | Registered: April 19, 2004
posted
Yes Lindell, the dial on the left is the one on the watch.

Thanks guys.
 
Posts: 767 | Location: Los Osos, California USA | Registered: December 12, 2002
Picture of Clyde Roper
posted
Jerry that sounds like a nice watch and I wouldn't lose any sleep over the case change either.

If my father had carried the watch with the other case for many years it would be different, but in this case- excuse the pun- I would make the change and not look back!

An image of the watch would be nice, too. Big Grin
 
Posts: 203 | Location: North Carolina in the USA | Registered: December 05, 2006
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


©2002-2023 Internet Horology Club 185™ - Lindell V. Riddle President - All Rights Reserved Worldwide

Internet Horology Club 185™ is the "Family-Friendly" place for Watch and Clock Collectors