Internet Horology Club 185
Waltham 1892 "Railroader"
January 09, 2007, 17:08
Michael ValekWaltham 1892 "Railroader"
All, can anyone shead some light on this question,
What are the correct hands for a Waltham model 1892?
Thanks
Mike
January 09, 2007, 21:00
Tom HuberMichael, I have four model 92's and they all have spade hands. The weight of hands should be appropriate to the type of dial. If the dial is RN, the spade hands should be the thin type. If the dial is Arabic, the size (weight) of the hands should be appropriate for the size of the numerals.
Hope this helps.
Tom
January 10, 2007, 06:12
Michael ValekTom,thanks for your reply. The dial on the movement is the Railroader type dial,are you familiar with it? Im unable to post a picture at this time.
Mike
January 10, 2007, 20:55
Tom HuberMike, I am not familiar with the dial you mean. Are the arabic numerals a large size, ie a heavy gothic dial, or are the numeral medium size?
Tom
January 11, 2007, 06:50
Michael ValekTom, in my opinion they are a "Bold" Aribic,when you say Heavy Gothic I tend to think of the Ilinois Sangamo Gothic numbers. No ,this Dial does not have numbers that resemble the gothic style of the Illinos dial. Here is an example of a similar dial.
Mike
January 11, 2007, 20:30
Tom HuberMIke, I would think that medium weight spade hands would be very appropriate for that dial.
Tom
January 11, 2007, 20:34
Michael ValekTom ,not being very familar with Waltham hands,would you have an example you could post?
Thanks
Mike
Note Pic Added: I found this pic with google search, are these the hands you are reffering to?
January 11, 2007, 21:01
Lindell V. Riddle
Mike, although different dials, perhaps these images might be of help.
(Movement number 11027026 is a 21-Jewel 1892 Crescent Street)January 11, 2007, 21:02
Lindell V. Riddle
Below, heavy spade similar to what you found on your internet search.
(Movement number 16168455 a 23-Jewel 1892 Vanguard Indicator)
January 11, 2007, 22:01
Michael ValekLindell, This first picture,would those be the Medium spade that Tom is reffering to?
Thanks
January 11, 2007, 22:05
Michael ValekLindell ,If I seek I shall find!! take a look at the post I found right here, the very last post.
https://ihc185.infopop.cc/eve/f...6047761/m/6351015422I would say these are the hands I need to complete my watch. The dial is of the same style even though it is a differnt model movement. What say you? mike
January 12, 2007, 08:47
Lindell V. Riddle
I would agree completely, that is probably the "look" you are after.
By the way, the Crescent Street example I shared might be more of a "light spade" and the others might be considered a "heavy spade" design. Tom was probably thinking of something in between those. Look on page 364 of the 2006 watch guide for a representitive depiction of hands.

January 12, 2007, 09:00
Mark CrossMy 18s 1892 Crescent Street has the exact same dial and hand match up as yours Lindell, and is probably my personal favorite in terms of over all appearance. It's easy to look at and read too!
My movement is currently awaiting the return of it's case from being replated.
Regards! Mark
January 12, 2007, 14:52
Michael ValekLindell, Yes, thats what Im looking for. I hope I can find a set of hands. The hunt is on!

January 12, 2007, 23:32
Jerry TreimanHere are the proper hands as shown in the Waltham 1909 material catalog. Note the extra bold second hand.
January 13, 2007, 06:33
Michael ValekJerry,
Thank you for the P/Ns, the hunt is progressing. Im still searching.
I found a set of hands in PA. I should have them shortly. Thank you everybody for your help.
Mike
January 13, 2007, 13:22
Jerry TreimanI am not sure how far those 1909 part numbers will get you. In the 1936 catalog the hour and minute hand for a '92 model are 1626 and 1688. They only show the second had for 16-size and its number is 1683.
July 16, 2007, 20:52
Michael ValekWell its been a while since I've been here....the job has had me out of town for some time.
I've been wanting to post this for while .... here it is, an 18sz 17jewel Waltham Railroader...the S/N puts it in a run of the first 50, with 4 runs totaling 260 movements. The case is 4oz of coin silver by Blauer..the chain is Sterling Sliver and weighs about 6-7 oz. Thanks to all who helped me in my hunt for the parts and repairs to bring this watch back. Oh yeah it keeps RR time also,not bad for being 100 years old
July 16, 2007, 20:53
Michael ValekThank you to
Leon Harris who did the repairs to the case........I highly recommend Leon!!!
BIG Thanks Lindell for sending me that killer original seconds hand!!!!
July 16, 2007, 20:54
Michael ValekLastly the matching Railroader movement number 7489835
July 16, 2007, 22:07
Richard MoreyMike, Very nice watch and chain, it makes for a fantastic presentation.
Thanks for sharing it.
Rick
July 16, 2007, 22:31
Gary MorgretVERY nice Richard
Thx for sharing.
Gary
July 16, 2007, 23:24
Joseph W. RobinsonWow Mike, That watch is SWEET!!

Joe
July 17, 2007, 01:26
Joseph W. RobinsonMike, Got to thinking about your dial and hands for this example and said to myself... I got a Waltham CPR that's similar. So I dug it out and took a few pics. It's a model 83. s.n. 5742797, circa Feb. 1893. Just another example for comparison.
Joe
Joseph W. Robinson
July 17, 2007, 01:28
Joseph W. RobinsonPicture of CPR movement.
July 17, 2007, 17:02
Michael ValekKiller Watch Joe!!! Thanks for sharing.I wonder how many more are out there??? Come on IHC members Lets see em!!
November 23, 2007, 15:26
Michael ValekOK everybody...I asking for some help.
I am asking the membership if anyone out there may have a clue or further documentation on these watches. Any help is greatly appreciated.
November 23, 2007, 16:34
Norman BlissHi Michael
It appears to me it's just a 17j RR grade of the 1892 model intended for railroad men. Ditto for the 1888 Railroader. I find listings in Railroad Timekeeping that Lindell mentioned (#s 38 & 83), American Pocket Watches by Ehrhardt & Meggers, & Townsend's American Railroad Watches. No indication they're special orders, probably just named to appeal to RR men.
Norman
November 23, 2007, 17:41
Michael ValekHi Norman.... thats what I thought also "just a name that appealed to RR Men". I have to admit its fun searching for information. Youre correct its a 1892 movement,but the markings make it rare. I think the total production was 260 movements with these markings.