Internet Horology Club 185
Trying to identify a watch

This topic can be found at:
https://ihc185.infopop.cc/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/1086047761/m/2493909577

November 25, 2012, 21:45
Jason Paul Watson
Trying to identify a watch
Hello ,
Thanks for having me in your group. I have a couple of antique pocketwatches I am trying to identify. The one in the picture here I have the original bill of sale from 1860 for 90 dollars. It has McCabe engraved on the back and it is 23 jewelled. I am not sure how many pictures I am allowed to post of it so I am just going to post the one until I know more.
Thanks

18k Gold Pocketwatch 1860

November 25, 2012, 22:09
Jason Paul Watson
Here is another photo of the face of the watch


November 25, 2012, 22:13
Jason Paul Watson
Another picture of the inside movement


November 25, 2012, 22:15
Jason Paul Watson
This is the bill of sale to a Thos.P Lamphear

Bill of Sale

November 25, 2012, 23:38
Tom Brown
Hi Jason
I can't tell you anything about your watch other than there is a very good chance your watch case may be gold. The 90 that was spent in 1860 was probably in British Pounds based on the location of the business on the receipt. But 90 pounds was a large amount of money back them.

If it would be possible to post some close up photos of the movement and any hallmarks on the case perhaps more can be determined.

It looks like a very fine watch.
November 26, 2012, 00:24
David Abbe
With all the wheels Pivot and cap Jeweled there is no doubt about it having 23 jewels! It must be a solid gold case.

This watch deserves careful research before it is put back in the safe deposit box!
I am amazed at the simplicity of the receipt description for such an expensive . . . "Gold Lever watch".
November 26, 2012, 00:45
Tom Brown
I was mistaken about the receipt being in pounds, from the address & watch I was assuming the UK but after searching I see that the business was located on Westminster Street Providence Rhode Island. Still odds are solid gold perhaps 18K.
November 26, 2012, 01:01
Tom Brown
Also I think the spelling of the person who bought the watch is Thomas P. Lanphear, a "n" instead of a "m".

He was born about 1806 and lived in Warick & Providence RI. In the 1860 census he is listed as a machinist. He was partners in a foundry called Levalley, Lanphear & Co.. It later became the Lanphear Machine Company.
November 26, 2012, 03:13
Jason Paul Watson
The number 3450 on the watch case is the same number that is on the inside of the watch as well as on the front of the case(if that makes sense) the engrament says Mcabe London 23 jewels and I am sure it is 18k as I had a local jeweler look at it but he had not heard of james mccabe before so I thought I would speak with people who knew more on the topic


November 26, 2012, 03:15
Jason Paul Watson
There is a closer shot of the movement


November 26, 2012, 06:59
Eugene Buffard
In 1860 American Watch makers where not even close with having 23 jewels in the watches. This is an extremely great watch.

The owner wanted the best and it looks as though he bought it.

Back in that time how many days- years would that have taken a average worker to come up with.
November 26, 2012, 10:55
Bruce Byrd
Eugene,
I was thinking the same thing.. Around the 1860's, we (American watch makers) were still very low in our jewel counts.. It's cool to see a watch that is that old with that many jewels (in a gold case to boot)..


Bruce Byrd
November 26, 2012, 11:33
Dennis McCann
According to this inflation calculator, $90.00 in 1860 worth be worth about $2,500.00 in today's dollars.

http://www.davemanuel.com/inflation-calculator.php
November 26, 2012, 12:28
Steven Ford
JAMES McCABE Watch maker. http://www.lurganancestry.com/mccabe.htm

This could be the maker of this watch.

Nice watch!!!

Steve
November 26, 2012, 13:46
Tom Brown
I had thought the same thing except James died in 1811, maybe they continued to use his name. I also found where there were fakes made using his name.
November 26, 2012, 15:06
Steven Ford
Now that I look closer, you're right, Tom.
I did see on another site that a son or son-in-law
took over the business. Can't find that site now though. Oh well.... Fun to hunt anyway.

Steve
November 26, 2012, 21:22
Mark Zaun
Pounds in the 1860's were far more valuable then dollars. 90 pounds in 1860 is about $11,000 today.
November 27, 2012, 03:40
Jason Paul Watson
http://www.antique-watch.com/ref/jmc-coll.html

Pieces of time James Mcabe article if very interesting to read. I think this might be the site you are speaking about Steven
November 27, 2012, 04:01
Jason Paul Watson
i ALSO FOUND THIS ARTICLE OF jAMES MCABLE MAKING THREE WATCHES FOR GEORGE WASHINGTON

http://books.google.com/books?...20WASHINGTON&f=false


November 27, 2012, 14:20
Richard M. Jones
This may not be of much help but Mcabe was a well known English maker and if the owner was a machinist it stands to reason he would want best quality. In 1860 the best machinists and pattern makers were found in that general area of the New England states. One of the reasons the North won the Civil war. Beautiful watch!


Deacon
November 28, 2012, 06:43
Jason Paul Watson
Would there be anywhere on the watch in particular that it may have been signed that I have over looked?
November 28, 2012, 10:56
Ethan Lipsig
The movement in Jason's watch clearly is Swiss. The Swiss made countless thousands or millions of these bar movements, almost all unsigned. Jason's may be higher jeweled or more highly finished than most, but it isn't unusual in any other way that I can see.

The Swiss had no compunction in those days of selling "Swiss Fakes." These included ersatz U.S. watch look alikes, but also misbranded English watches. One often sees Swiss watches bearing the famous "Tobias" brand. I think Jason's watch is an example of this misbranding, using the famous "McCabe" name. (James McCabe was a top English watchmaker.) It is possible that the real Tobias or real James McCabe might have imported Swiss movements and sold them under their own names, but I am skeptical that Jason's watch ever had anything to do with the real James McCabe.
November 28, 2012, 11:45
David Abbe
To this point it seems that we have established;
1. There WAS a James M Cabe (Jr.) in the watch business who would be in his sixties in the mid-1800's when this watch was (evidently) made.
2. This watch began life (unmistakably) as a Swiss "ebauche Bar Movement".
3. AFTER receiving the movement someone completed the watch with a set of Gold wheels, 8 pairs of Capped Jeweled Pivots, adding 16 Jewels to the original 7 Jewel movement and completing the watch as a 23 Jewel Masterpiece.
4. The completed masterpiece has been cased in a matching serial number 18K SOLID GOLD case signed "M Cabe".
5. To establish the facts of this movement, I would urgently suggest sending a GOOD set of pictures to;
Pieces of Time
1 - 7 Davies Mews - - London W1Y 2LP
Telephone + 44 (0) 207 629 2422
Fax + 44 (0) 207 409 1625
E-mail - info@antique-watch.com

. . . as these people seem to know a whole lot about M Cabe's work. They also have many of his watches listed for sale including some certified "Fake" ones.
November 28, 2012, 13:34
Jason Paul Watson
Ok I have sent off the email with some pretty clear pictures and the stats as you listed. Hint when taking pictures of a gold watch: make sure you are not wearing your underwear and standing in the reflection . Smile hopefully we will hear something back from them soon. the suspense is killing me
November 28, 2012, 15:02
Jason Paul Watson
maybe i should rephrase that :the response is killing me. Johnny from Pieces of Times is a man of few words:
sorry but its a fake made in Switzerland
Regards Johnny.
Wait I just reread your post again , they sell "fake" ones on thier website?
November 28, 2012, 20:35
Ethan Lipsig
I also said it was a fake James McCabe, but that doesn't mean it is a fake watch. Some posters here regard it highly.
November 29, 2012, 17:07
Jason Paul Watson
Yes Ethan You are correct. McCabe or not it still is a fantastic piece. It even makes it more of a mystery.I wonder if the original buyer thought it was a McCabe or of it was even altered by him after he bought it. I also wonder if it brings down the value of the watch.
November 29, 2012, 19:05
David Abbe
If inspection of the watch shows the cap jewelled wheel pivots are conical, the quality of the movement is much increased. It would be very interesting to find where it came from.
There could be a "hint" under the dial on the top of the dial plate.
November 29, 2012, 21:07
Jason Paul Watson
i would be a bit nervous to play with the dial as I haven't ever taken off a dial plate . when i wind the watch it begins to work immediately , would the key give any indication to the shape of the pivots??
November 29, 2012, 21:10
David Abbe
In that gold case, it matters little if it runs well, just keep it as a treasure. One thing we learn the hard way (sometimes) is the more you fiddle with these pieces of antiquity the more you can (will) mess them up.
November 30, 2012, 00:02
Tom Brown
This has nothing to do with the watch itself, just thought I would post there was a 2nd Thomas Lanphear in Providence RI, except he died during the civil war.

This is from U.S., Adjutant General Military Records