SN 234950

Seth Thomas, 21J, Adjusted

SN 214550

Seth Thomas, 17J, adj

This one is the same as the one before but shows the SN- 214550, Seth Thomas, 17J, adj.

Seth Thomas SN 294547 15J

This one is my watch, need better pictures of the movement before I post it. However here' the dial. It seems to be a newer dial.

The jewels have gold coloring, and are screwed down, and it looks like there was gold on the movement, and it was removed while cleaning, because there's gold on the regulator, and a slight hint of it on the movement, so I think it was cleaned off.

The case is a Wadsworth Pilot and is marked 2 Plates of Solid Gold, 25 Years.

Notice the slight bit of gold color on the regulator.

Here is a pic of my ST, model 5 tu-tone. Sadly,the gold is a bit washed out on the barrel bridge.

For Ed--I had sent the data on this watch to Kent a while back.

Tom

Tom pretty movement thanks for showing it i like the 2 tones.

Another one for the Model 5 database. S# 236,181 17J, 2 tone model 5.

A few I have found

214662

214662 Dial, Nickel Case

224178

224178 Dial
Name on the dial is

Wm. Arnold
Ann Arbor, Mich.

227238

227238 Dial

229562

229562 Dial

Look close, is this one a real Seth Thomas Model 5? Missing parts? Looks wrong to me. However Samie posted one here that has the same regulator as this one, and I posted my other one with the same regulator. ?????????????????
(This one is mine)

SN 284674

Sheila, That is a real ST, model 5.

Tom

Hi Tom,
Thank you, I was not real sure, because most I see have damaskeening on them.

This is another one that sold on ebay.

SN 294168

Not a good photo, but that is the correct serial number. It came in an Silver Illinois case.

Same--- SN 294168

Hi Sheila
It looks like you are into poccket watches, I just have one, and no history about it. you wrote to me already, please check out the pictures i posted, its under my : can anybody tell me .....
Thanks
Marek
marekoto@msn.com

Dial to the Seth above SN 284674

VERY different than picture!!!!!!!!!!

Picture Terrible, the dial is actually MUCH BETTER than the picture shows it to be, and you can't see the lines without a magnifier!!!!!!!!!!