May 09, 2008, 13:58
David AbbeA Lincoln . . . to Getty or Not to Getty!
I have scraped up a couple nicely used and restorable Illinois 16 size pieces that have an interesting relationship . . .
May 09, 2008, 14:09
David AbbeThe one on the left is a (beautiful) model 5, 21 Jewel, 1913 vintage Getty Movement which in production was followed by some Sangamo-Getty's. The one on the right is a Model 9, 21 Jewel, 1919 vintage Movement that was preceded by some 21 Jewel Bunn specials. These are Both "A. Lincoln" models for which no distinction is made between the movements in our watch guide. I will be restoring these now, and musing on the sad truth that the Illinois factory chose to discontinue the exquisite Getty Movement somewhere in the mid 19-teens which I opine to say makes the Gettys eminently more collectible! So my question is: Why does the watch guide make no distinction, AND are they of equal value?
May 09, 2008, 15:54
Thomas A. OverfieldI figure there must be some improvement in design found in the post-Getty models. Were the Getty models thicker? Harder to work on? More parts? Just wondering.
May 09, 2008, 21:34
Steve MiddlesworthDavid,
How bizarre! I just purchased the Getty model on ebay and it arrived today. Last week my model 9 arrived. I too was confused in that there was no mention of the Getty variety in the price guide yet there were like 31,860 of these produced. How could this have been overlooked? They produced 24,840 of the Model 9 and that is the one that appears in the price guide. My model 5 has the same dial as yours but a dissimilar case. That movement is so cool. The model 9 looks like it could have had Bunn Special on it. I'll break out the camera tomorrow and post the pictures of mine.
Steve
May 09, 2008, 22:42
David AbbeThomas, The Getty models are (in my opinion) one of the finest Pocketwatch moevement designs ever done. They are incredibly practical, easy to work on, and modular in their functionality. Their (slight) misfortune was probably a slightly higher parts count, and a more expensive wind and set clutch mechanism.
Steve, bring on the pictures, this is fun!
The comical part of both movements I pictured is the fact that they are REALLY just 17 jewel movements with 4 extra "cap" jewels for the Escape and Pallet Pivots. Ball ran a famous ad for that ridiculous fact.
May 10, 2008, 08:52
Steve MiddlesworthDavid,
Here are the pictures of my two examples. The Getty is from a run in 1909 while the Model 9 was produced in 1918. The dials look to be the same on the Gettys. Both of mine seem to be keeping pretty decent time at this point.
Steve
May 10, 2008, 08:53
Steve Middlesworth....and from the front....
May 10, 2008, 18:11
David AbbeSteve you have a pair of real beauties! Great stuff these Illinois pieces! It seemed like every run they had made more "collector" pieces. I jokingly refer to what Illinois W.Co. could have called the "Watch a month club".
May 10, 2008, 18:36
Steve MiddlesworthDave,
Yours look to be in very nice condition. My Getty could use a dial so if you ever come across one in nice condition let me know. I plan on keeping these examples.
Steve