Well since I can't use this Duber case on the 1886 Hampden, I've taken an 1886 Illinois Model 2 Grade 65 movement and it fits very nicley. But and there's always a but. Is this a likely match back then? Dueber from the east and Illinois from the central US? Or was it more lokely that a Elgin Case or illinois case would of originally been fitted to this movement. I do have later 1900's Illinois both 18s and 16s that come in Illinois cases.
Thank you, Roland.
R. Glenn
Posts: 437 | Location: Ryde, Isle of Wight, United Kingdom | Registered: January 18, 2010
Opps, guess I should post the serial number. Getting older it seems. # 337350 and I've always liked the Chalmers regulators compaired to what Hampden utilized back then.
R. Glenn
Posts: 437 | Location: Ryde, Isle of Wight, United Kingdom | Registered: January 18, 2010
Roland my impression is that Deuber would sell cases to anyone and any company willing to purchase them. I think it was later that there were monopoly cases and all sorts of accusations of dumping and such that case companies became aligned with watch companies
Posts: 1797 | Location: Michigan in the USA | Registered: September 19, 2009
Thank you Claude. Just wasn't sure if Dueber sold that far west back then. This case originally came on a Trenton. After Hampden moved to Canton in 88 then I could see them selling more to the midwest area. Just wasn't sure if in 86 it could be a match.
Thx, Roland.
R. Glenn
Posts: 437 | Location: Ryde, Isle of Wight, United Kingdom | Registered: January 18, 2010