Aloha, I have acquired a Ball Elgin 17 jewel ORRS, OF watch that has engraved on the barrel bridge "5 Positions". I have inspected many, many Ball Elgin ORRS 17J and 21J movements and I have never seen this engraving before on a single movement. I am positive from the gold lettering and comparing the type face with the other engravings that this is factory original. The dial is a Ball ORRS 24 hour dial. I would like to receive replies from the ihc185 members if there is anyone who has seen this annotation on a Ball Elgin ORRS movement or have like specimens in their collections. Mahalo, Fred
Posts: 106 | Location: Honolulu, Hawaii in the USA | Registered: June 12, 2016
It is legitimate, if you notice you will see that it is slightly off center and the font seems odd but starting around 12M you will see this in a spotty way appearing on 341's, 370's and a few other 18 sizes like the 149/348. I have a few like this that Elgin just stamped "5 Positions" on the plates somewhere. it must have been a transitional stamping because the later 370 were adapted and more stylish.
Posts: 1797 | Location: Michigan in the USA | Registered: September 19, 2009
Mahalo Claude, I appreciate your information and insight. I have been advised that this variant may have been used on Canadian export Ball Elgins but this is the first Ball Elgin I have seen with this engraving. I am curious if any of the IHC185 members have or have seen any Ball Elgins with the "5 Positions" on their watches. Thank you, again. Aloha, Fred
Posts: 106 | Location: Honolulu, Hawaii in the USA | Registered: June 12, 2016
Again getting back to my comment, the stamping that is on your Ball is found on other Elgins so I do not think for any reason that it was just done for Ball Elgins. My 341 has a 24 hr dial but none of the other ones that I have that are stamped this way have a 24 hour dial so I doubt it was a "Canadian Export" stamping since there were probably some East coast RRs that were pressing for the adj5p being marked around the time that Elgin was in the 12-14M time frame.
Posts: 1797 | Location: Michigan in the USA | Registered: September 19, 2009
12M for Elgin was in the 1905-1906 range, since the requirement was not universal the lines that were probably in the Midwest and east coast which was more on the influence of Mr. Ball may have started requiring this. The stampings were not just as a run from the grades that I have that are marked this way but more added on an adhoc basis. The stamping looks like it was an added later but the looks are consistent between the ones I have and look like the on the Ball pictured. My 341 photos used to be up on here but once American Greeting decided to cast aside Webshots picture hosting all those uploads were lost.
Posts: 1797 | Location: Michigan in the USA | Registered: September 19, 2009
I have seen some Elgin 21J No. 349's that had a 5 positions marking added on to the barrel plate, much like Fred's Elgin Ball.Looks perfectly legit to me too.Done to satisfy the new regulations.They probably had unfinished or unsold movements in the vault and this brought them up to the new specs.
Posts: 1323 | Location: Lebanon, Connecticut USA | Registered: March 28, 2008
Aloha Claude, Lorne, and Theodore, thank you very much for sharing this important information. As I mentioned, I have inspected a great number of Ball Elgin movements and have never seen one with the "5 Positions" on the movement which persuades me to believe that Claude's suspicion that they were so engraved on an adhoc basis is probably correct. I, too, feel it is totally legit and, frankly, scarce. I am pleased to own it. Again, thank you, all, for your input and sharing of comments and opinions. Mahalo nui, Fred
Posts: 106 | Location: Honolulu, Hawaii in the USA | Registered: June 12, 2016
Fred Certainly not an expert, tho I have seen the Ball-Hamilton marked with five positions. Maybe the first year would be interesting to discover? 1902?
Aloha Mike, thank you for the photograph with the annotation on the movement of "5 Positions" which looks exactly like the engraving on my Ball Elgin. BTW, that is a beautiful watch. Knowing what year this started is anyone's guess. Again, mahalo for the post, Fred
Posts: 106 | Location: Honolulu, Hawaii in the USA | Registered: June 12, 2016
In some cases the watch might have been in service but needed "5 position" markings to satisfy the RR line requirements. Sometimes you will see a watch like the grade 150 which would have been in the 1895-1897 range marked so in some cases the owner could have sent it back to Elgin to be marked to satisfy the RR lines requirements. One example you will see this adhoc marking is on the grade 370, normally it would have been marked "Adjusted" on the balance cock with no further adjustment markings then later you see this adhoc stamping at various locations with the balance cock still showing "Adjusted" engraved on it then later you see a style dmk effect change on the balance cock that is no longer marked "Adjusted" and a more stylized "Adjusted 5 Positions" marking on it. You see this on many of Elgin's higher grades with little to no rhyme or reason to it from run to run or even within a run.
Posts: 1797 | Location: Michigan in the USA | Registered: September 19, 2009
Perhaps what follows will help with this discussion.
About "5-Positions" markings. During 1906 several Railroad lines began requiring "Positions" to be marked on movementa entering RR Time Service. To see the gradual changes in Ball Watches throughout the years of 18-size production click the following link...
Study the first 4 topics in our Ball Research Forum and you will find a 1906 entry numbered 503954 is the first among those shown to carry the "Adjusted 5-Positions" marking. Prior to that time you will see all the movements merely have "Adjusted" markings. The Ball-Elgin that Fred found was likely re-marked at the Ball facility in Cleveland where they used their in-house pantograph in order to add or update markings on movements.
Always remember the finishing, adjusting, casing of all Ball Watches in the early 20th Century was performed at Ball Watch Company in Cleveland, Ohio. It was not unusual in the watch industry to re-mark unsold inventory in order to bring them up to then-current standards. Many times Ball Watches arrived in Cleveland several years after original production and since their origins were never disclosed in Ball Advertising let alone at point of sale the watch a customer received could be whichever make they chose to sell at any given time. Vaulted watches were often upgraded because unlike produce and dairy products they did not have a "sell-by' date.
We turn to Mike Benda's 16-size Ball-Hamilton which acording to our workup of Ball-Hamilton 16-size movements and find his listed as follows...
B617001-B619000___2,000_____23______999____No Seal, Motor Barrel___(1926-28)
You will notice we list the very first numbered Ball-Hamilton 16-size as number B600001 which resides in my collection housed in a 14K Solid Gold "Ball Watch Company - Cleveland,Ohio" case
In summation I suggested what one should be looking for...
Well, many collectors favor rarity, so from these numbers in ascending order the least common of 16-size Ball Hamiltons are the (700) "2B-Prefix" 999B examples and (also at approximately 700) Straight-Line Damaskeening 999B which were the last American-Made Ball Watches. Next we find the 23-Jewel without Gold Seal (2,000) like Mike Benda's example then 21-Jewel with the Gold Seal (2,300) and finally at (2,700) the 998-Elinvars. Personally I want at least one of each variant but of course that's me.
Hopefully these numbers will be of interest to collectors and researchers.
And the beat goes on!
Lindell
Posts: 10553 | Location: Northeastern Ohio in the USA | Registered: November 19, 2002
Thanks Lindell, For the record, Tom sold that Ball from his site. It is not mine, the pic was borrowed from the thread for discussion. Very nice watch, hopefully it is ok to copy photos like that. Mike
Posts: 1119 | Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia in the USA | Registered: February 08, 2015
Aloha Mike, Lindell, and Claude. Thank you for the very interesting and informative posts. Excellent discussion. I tend to think that Lindell's theory that the Ball Elgin I have was marked with "5 positions" post manufacture is accurate. As I said previously I have inspected quite a few Ball Elgin movements and this is the only one I have seen with this marking validating, to me anyway, Lindell's theory and it is a one-off specimen. Frankly, I also agree with Lindell about wanting to collect variants that surface and that is why I wanted this Ball Elgin to begin with. To date, I have not heard from any ihc185 member who has a similar specimen so I tend to think this is a scarce variant. Does this add value? I believe that depends on the individual collector and their desire to add it to their collection. For me the answer was "yes". Anyway, I love the complications that this circumstance presents. Again, mahalo for the great posts. Fred
Posts: 106 | Location: Honolulu, Hawaii in the USA | Registered: June 12, 2016
Aloha Mike, thank you for the final thoughts. If I hear of any other Ball Elgins or see any other Ball Elgins with the engraving of "5 positions" I will let everyone in ihc185 know. Have a great day, Fred
Posts: 106 | Location: Honolulu, Hawaii in the USA | Registered: June 12, 2016