Internet Horology Club 185
"U.S. Army Air Corps" Marked Hamilton 4992B
March 22, 2004, 12:56
Chris Abell"U.S. Army Air Corps" Marked Hamilton 4992B
I recently found this superb example of a Hamilton 4992B, clearly it is a very early one. Can anyone pin it down to a month and also I note that on the plate marked 4992B it also has “US Army Air Corps” stamped on it. Is this a early run stamp and later dropped in the regular production?
March 22, 2004, 12:57
Chris AbellCase-Back Markings...
March 22, 2004, 12:57
Chris AbellVery sharp 4C-1828 marked "US Army Air Corps" movement...
March 22, 2004, 12:58
Chris AbellFlawless Dial and Hands
March 22, 2004, 13:53
Terry Hillgreat item!
can you show an image of serial number between plates....
March 22, 2004, 13:59
Chris AbellSorry, old age is setting in, Movement Number 4C1828 On the box it says to service if not used by July 23 1943 which is interesting. As you can see, this watch is in un-issued condition.
March 22, 2004, 16:49
Rob CarterHi Chris,
That is a beautiful example of a 4992B and a great shot of the hack brake by the serial number. Thanks for posting.
Rob
March 22, 2004, 20:08
Chris AbellThe pictures came out well, was just aiming to get the Ser No in but a bonus! Can anyone get the dates to a month?
March 22, 2004, 20:42
Terry HillIf you make a request to the Library, they can give you some detailed information on the movement.
It is in Book 365 of the Hamilton Ledgers. Some condensed information from the "Handwritten" serial number book published by Roy Ehrhardt gives:
4C001 was finished 11-13-41 and sold 2-16-42
4C15500 was finished 1-22-43 and sold 1-22-43 [the same day]
the contract numbers are 64-95096 and 64-8423 respectively
March 22, 2004, 20:47
Terry HillChris,
As I stated above, your example is very nice and has some features I had not noticed before...
1. "US Army Air Corps" marking
2. Font of the "Adjusted 6 Positions"
I have the opinion the unusual 'adjusted' marking was a 'get by' procedure, as the bridge for the center seconds arbor would have covered the standard style marking seen on early commercially sold 992B movements. You will see the standard marking on the 992B movements with US Army on them also.
When the marking location on later examples was changed, they used the standard stamping dies for this mark.
March 22, 2004, 20:50
Terry HillI also have the outer box for this one.......notice how the box is marked Air Force?
There was a change in the Military but I cannot speak with authority on this...
March 22, 2004, 20:53
Terry HillBut this one was 'good' until '46

March 22, 2004, 20:55
Terry Hillpic of case back.... not as good as yours!
March 22, 2004, 21:02
Stu Goldstein"The Army Air Corps became a subordinate element of the Army Air Forces June 20, 1941. Since the Army Air Corps had been established by statute in 1926, its disestablishment required an act of Congress, which did not take place until 1947. Between March 9, 1942 and Sept 18, 1947, the Army Air Corps continued to exist as a combatant arm, and personnel of the Army Air Forces were still assigned to the Army Air Corps."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U...ates_Army_Air_ForcesStu Goldstein
March 22, 2004, 21:11
Chris AbellThanks for all the replies, most useful and was very interested to see the change in font and marking in later models and the air corps change over also. Please continue to add more if anyone can.
Chris A
November 29, 2004, 00:40
Lindell V. Riddle
Now that we have a "Military Timepieces Forum" we moved this interesting topic here from our "Pocket Watch Discussions" area. I'm pleased to report the very early 4992B numbered 4C1828 under discussion at the top of this topic is now in my collection. What an amazing example it is!
Here is more information about it based upon the Hamilton Ledgers in Columbia...
"Hamilton 4992B number 4C1828 was finished on July 23, 1942 and sold the same day to Code Number 64-0964 which is a government code."
That clearly explains the "July 23, 1943" service recommendation on the box! Now, if we could determine what "64-0964" was that might prove very interesting. Please post any comments or additional information below.

February 04, 2005, 20:31
Gary FranceI know this thread is a bit old but when I came across it I joined your forum just to post this. This watch was my wife's uncle' s watch. He was in the Army Air Corps in WWII. He carried it from the time of his service till his death in 1971. It was given to me by my father-in-law in 1974 and I carried it for 5 or 6 years and them put it away. It is 7 serial numbers before Chris Abell's watch. What I always wondered about was the the number "4" ahead of the "992B". I don't know if you can tell or not but the 4 has no black in it and it isn't struck near as deep as the other numbers, almost as though it was an after thought.
February 04, 2005, 20:38
Gary FranceThe back of the case...
February 04, 2005, 22:24
Terry HillWhew! Those are close numbers!! Thanks for posting it!
Here are some tidbits I have discovered...
Contract w535 AC22375..... From 1942, but no indications of time of year....
Sold to:
Finance Officer
US Navy
Wright Field
Dayton Ohio
Shipped to:
Quartermaster
Fairfield Air Depot
Osborn, Ohio
For Air Corps Supply Officer
755 4992B watches, navigation master, 50-079 @ 29.45 each
3040 4992B watches, navigation master, 50-079 @ 29.45 each
*** from other entries, it seems the 50-079 is a dial reference....