February 21, 2006, 09:11
Greg ReevesGeo. E. Fisher, London
Got this one in for repair yesterday. I love these English clocks. Thought I would share.
February 21, 2006, 09:19
Greg ReevesClose-up of top. Adam and Eve move.
February 22, 2006, 09:45
Tom SeymourThis reply is really from Gordon MacDonald. He had some trouble posting the picture so I am attempting to help him out. His post is:
quote:
Hi Greg. I am restoring a similar clock, ( with lots of help). The false plate is marked Walker and Finnemore ( info on them says Birmingham 1808-11) I will try to include a pic of the very similar back plate, and the posts are identical. my weights are suspended on gut. On the face of the dial above center, very faint is Chas Tbui....r ..broath. Arbroath I presume.
I am using 7 1/2 pound weights, but I am having trouble with the strike side. Are the weights on that clock in this range and is the strike side heavier?
February 22, 2006, 16:05
Greg ReevesGood afternoon.
The weights are: Time = 14lbs., Strike = 14.9lbs
The false plate states: BIRMINGHAM
TRYANT
This has brass cables. I'm not sure what it would have been originally.
February 22, 2006, 19:12
John WoolseyHi Tom,
As a general rule, the strike weight is always heavier. As well as driving the train, it also has to provide power to lift the hammer against its spring or counterweight, plus where appropriate, overcome whatever 'warning' and locking / unlocking mechanism which may be fitted. It also has to drive against the 'fly' governor.
A lot of 'grunt' needed to drive that lot!

Greg, I believe clocks of that era would have had gut lines. A common problem with them being breakages, causing the affected weight to smash through the floor of the case!
I've seen quite a few fitted with bronze lines though ..... probably converted by their owners after being scared witless in the middle of the night by a cast iron weight belting the floor! (and subsequently having to change the bed sheets no doubt)
Has the dial been refinished at some point? It looks much cleaner and less aged than the 'Adam & Eve' dial.
I've checked all my reference books (Loomes & Baillie) and can find no reference to a George Fisher in London at all.
There is recorded, a George Fisher(Frederick)M.D. USA for 1800, also George (Troy)USA 1837-46, another in Canada 1857-63 and interestingly, one for Birmingham (UK) 1850.
There are a few 'Fisher & Sons' but no sons named, so could be one of those.
I have other theories on the dial, but I'm saying nowt unless invited

Best regards
John Woolsey
February 22, 2006, 22:17
Greg ReevesAs far as the differences in the dials...I think you are seeing the contrast not only by the flash of the camera...which is very big now that you mention it, but also caused by the painting itself. I don't beleive it has been repainted, but feel free to add your opinions. I'm going to e-mail you a copy so that you can see it better.
It's going to be shipped to Martha Smallwood for cleaning and touch-up.
The case to this clock is pretty much unremarkable...of average quality.
February 25, 2006, 11:10
Gordon Mac DonaldHi Greg. Thanks for the info on the weights. Could you post a picture of the case. I only have the hood for mine. Thanks in advance.
February 25, 2006, 11:43
Greg ReevesI don't have the case. The customer is supposed to be having it restored while I do the movement. But, when I return the movement...I will try to remember to get a photo of it.
greg
March 01, 2006, 06:55
Greg ReevesMy problem: the hand of eve, looks to move...however all of the linkage(on mine) is missing. I can't figure out what the linkage attaches to on the movement. I assumed that it attached to the seconds or possibly the strike, but don't see any sign of where it would.
John: Sorry I haven't gotten back to you...forgetful. But your e-mail was interesting and would, I think be benificial to the post. Thanks
March 01, 2006, 12:27
John WoolseyHi Greg,
Are there any auxilliary gears on the motionwork, or somewhere on the calendar work that would drive the linkage?
If a link was pinned to a gear it would act like a crank. Hard to tell without seeing it, or knowing how fast the figures move so just guessing.
I'll post a copy of the Email regarding the clock info shortly.
Best regards
John
March 01, 2006, 12:53
J. Bruce WeeksFrom what I've seen of moving dial ornaments on old English bell strike GF's, they are usually linked to the verge. I imagine there are some that would in someway be linked to the strike so that they only move when the clock is striking. I haven't seen any of those though.
May 18, 2006, 15:06
Greg ReevesThought I would post a before and after re-touch.
The work was done by:
Kathi S. Edwards
Dial House II
1555 McGarity Rd.
Temple, GA 30179-2106
770-505-4417