WWT Shows CLICK TO: Join and Support Internet Horology Club 185™ IHC185™ Forums

• Check Out Our... •
• TWO Book Offer! •
Go
New Topic
Find-Or-Search
Notify
Tools
Reply to Post
  
Help to Date and Identify Gilbert "Click" to Login or Register 
posted
Hi all,
A friend came in today and showed me this Gilbert which has been stored in his house for some while.
Can someone tell me the likley date?
Are the plates and bushes steel? They look like it but there is so much oil about it is difficult to be accurate.
Do you experts rebush with steel bushes?
Thanks in advance,

Peter

 
Posts: 110 | Location: Chalfont St Giles, Bucks, UK | Registered: June 03, 2006
posted
Herewith a scan of the steel bushes in the steel plate. Winding arbors are brass.
What sort of condition are those pivots going to be in?

Recommendations invited!

Peter

 
Posts: 110 | Location: Chalfont St Giles, Bucks, UK | Registered: June 03, 2006
Picture of Tom Seymour
posted
Steel plates. Yuk. I hate to work on them. I don't believe anyone uses steel bushings. Brass or bronze are the norm. From what I see in the picture it looks like the original factory stamping.


Tom
 
Posts: 2537 | Location: Mount Angel, Oregon in the U.S.A. | Registered: November 19, 2002
posted
Tom, can you clarify please, are you saying these are steel bushes that were in place when it left the factory? That was my conclusion, so the factory tooled up for steel bushes?

Peter
uk
 
Posts: 110 | Location: Chalfont St Giles, Bucks, UK | Registered: June 03, 2006
posted
Peter,
Most of that style movement I have seen have been steel plates with brass bushings at the pivot points. I think you may find the inserts brass if you scratch with a knife or something. I think many times the brass becomes discolored due to erosion of metals or something.
If you find the inserts are indeed steel, you should be able to bore and bush with brass bushings, leaving an acceptable repair. One danger of doing this is the necessity to bore beyond the original insert. If steel, the inserts in the plates will likely dull your reaming tool. I usually use a worn out tool because I am not ruining anything good. It just takes a long time to ream them.
I believe most steel plate movements were the result of metal shortage (either real or contrived) in the USA due to war efforts.
I have a gut feeling that clock was manufactured in the teens or 20’s due to the steel plates, case style, etc.
Best Regards,
Dick
 
Posts: 311 | Location: Berthoud, Colorado USA | Registered: December 08, 2002
posted
Dick,
Thanks for your thoughts. I've taken some scans of the bushes after a light clean, and I still think we have steel bushes of a top hat section, and if so they were installed at the factory, which to me is an extraordinary thing to do. I know the claim that brass was in short supply but the wheels are made of brass. And the steel upon steel wear ? Why not run steel pivot in steel plate, maybe they had answer to the steel upon steel and used a different steel for the bush? Are these steel bush examples rare? How long did this steel bush regime last? Where else are they seen?

Peter

 
Posts: 110 | Location: Chalfont St Giles, Bucks, UK | Registered: June 03, 2006
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


©2002-2023 Internet Horology Club 185™ - Lindell V. Riddle President - All Rights Reserved Worldwide

Internet Horology Club 185™ is the "Family-Friendly" place for Watch and Clock Collectors