WWT Shows CLICK TO: Join and Support Internet Horology Club 185™ IHC185™ Forums

• Check Out Our... •
• TWO Book Offer! •
Go
New Topic
Find-Or-Search
Notify
Tools
Reply to Post
  
Bedforde Railroad questions "Click" to Login or Register 
IHC Member 1369
posted
This will update a few much earlier posts but I thought I would revive the name since I now have one!

What I know...
The Bedforde Railroad pocket watch is a 16S 21J Swiss watch, grade/model 6500, apparently made for Goldsmith and Co in Toronto and was approved for use by the CNR, not CPR.

What I can't confirm and would appreciate any info on is...
Were these made by Unitas? Any manufacturing dates known? Any part of the train gold? Any other info that may be known?

Thanks,
Ralph
 
Posts: 542 | Location: Ontario in Canada | Registered: February 10, 2010
IHC Member 1369
posted
here's the movement

 
Posts: 542 | Location: Ontario in Canada | Registered: February 10, 2010
IHC Member 1418
Railroad Time Inspector
posted
Larry, Larry Buchan replied to a post Feb 17 2010 on Bedford watches. He did not say who produced them but they were approved by the CNR and some Mexican railrods in the 60's. He shows a nice example. Perhaps Larry whould be able to shed more light.
Walter
 
Posts: 105 | Location: British Columbia in Canada | Registered: May 05, 2010
IHC Member 163
Picture of Mark Cross
posted
I wonder why one Canadian road would approve its use in time service, but not the other. Confused

Regards! Mark
 
Posts: 3836 | Location: Estill Springs, Tennessee, USA | Registered: December 02, 2002
IHC Member 1418
Railroad Time Inspector
posted
Some more information. These watches were made for Goldsmith & Company Toronto by Untias movement 429 grade 6500 (some were called Elco).They were approved for the CNR but not the CPR. I have always been of the opinion that politics played a great part in what was approved and what was not.
Walter
 
Posts: 105 | Location: British Columbia in Canada | Registered: May 05, 2010
IHC Member 1369
posted
Mark, I have wondered about that as well and until I can get some info about when these were manufactured it would be a guess. But, if these were produced in the mid to late 1950's or into the 1960's it might be that CP had approved what they saw as the final pocket watch for their use by that time. That being the Zenith Extra 56.

If that were the case it would make sense that CP did not want to add another pw to the approved list. Just a guess.

And the quality of this Bedforde seems quite similar to the Zenith. [I must remember to ask the fellow who ordered these Zeniths the next time I am speaking with him. He may have some knowledge about this.]

It would also be interesting to know what relationship the Goldsmith company had with CN to get these approved.
 
Posts: 542 | Location: Ontario in Canada | Registered: February 10, 2010
Railway Historian
IHC Life Member
Site Moderator
Picture of Larry Buchan
posted
From my conversations with Peter Kushnir the last chief inspector of the the CPR Time Service Department, he told me that they had stricter guidelines than the CNR, I know one of one example a Bulova Accutron Railroad Approved Quartz Swiss 6945T that the CPR did not approve, and the CNR did, the watch had luminous 5 min. marks and hour and minute hands, the CPR were concerned that the luminous paint would deteriorate and flakes would get into the calendar and timekeeping mechanism. Another difference was the CNR chief inspector of time service in the 1960s approved dials that had 0 instead of 24 on their 24-hour type dials,

Larry

 
Posts: 3370 | Location: Okotoks Alberta Canada | Registered: November 22, 2002
IHC Member 163
Picture of Mark Cross
posted
Interesting! Thanks, Larry! Smile

Regards! Mark
 
Posts: 3836 | Location: Estill Springs, Tennessee, USA | Registered: December 02, 2002
posted
According to a June 1999 ***** article on Swiss Standard Railroad watches the authors spoke with Mr. Peter Kushnir, who was with CP Rail between 1964 and 1989. During that time he held various positions including "Company Clockman" and "Time Service Technician". Included in the article is a 1978 internal correspondence from Mr. Kushnir listing the CP railway approved watches and also a list of 4 unapproved watches which he said "some of our men are in possession of". The first watch on the list is the 16 size BEDFORDE, Swiss made 21 jewel. Later in the article when discussing the Bedforde, he said that CP didn't approve the watch because it was based on an ebauche. Although it was acceptable as produced with its "high grade of adjustment", there was the fear that a lower grade part could be substituted which would not perform to specification.

That explains why CP didn't approve it or at least why they said they didn't. It would be interesting to know what Canadian National thought about that reason, if they ever considered it.
 
Posts: 346 | Location: Woodland Hills, California in the USA | Registered: January 07, 2011
Railway Historian
IHC Life Member
Site Moderator
Picture of Larry Buchan
posted
Walter Colk said something interesting about politics being involved, I too believe this could have been a factor, you got to remember at the time this was taking place the Canadian Pacific Railway was a public company controlled by a board of directors and owned by shareholders. While on the other hand the Canadian National Railways was a conglomeration of bankrupt railways that tried to compete with the CPR and were taken over by the federal government after World War I, so they were what we call up here a Crown Corporation, much like Amtrak in the US, it is controlled by people appointed by the politicians in Ottawa. So I'm sure that lots of lobbying takes place in decision-making by the people who supply the railways.
 
Posts: 3370 | Location: Okotoks Alberta Canada | Registered: November 22, 2002
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


©2002-2023 Internet Horology Club 185™ - Lindell V. Riddle President - All Rights Reserved Worldwide

Internet Horology Club 185™ is the "Family-Friendly" place for Watch and Clock Collectors