September 23, 2007, 19:30
David AbbeWaltham 1883 "17 Jewel Adjusted" w 16j??
I just finished a major overhaul (new roller & pivots, plus some staff work) to "rescue" this neat dialed (never saw "Watch" that way before on a Waltham dial) 1883.
BUT, the (matching s/n) main plate has no top jewel for the center wheel! This is a 16 jewel watch. Anybody hear of any other 16 Jewel 1883's marked 17 "Jewels Adjusted"?
September 23, 2007, 19:31
David AbbeThe whole thing
September 23, 2007, 19:32
David AbbeA "Symbolic Watch word" dial!
September 23, 2007, 19:42
Peter S. BalkanI've seen that dial before. I THINK that Fred Hansen might have recently sold one.
I have never seen a 17J marked watch with only 16 Jewels. Do the plates match?
I HAVE a Hamilton 932 that is marked 17J and HAS 17J, even though the 932 model was a 16J watch. All the parts match too. It was made at the end of the 932 run and I have to presume that Hamilton just decided to up the jewel count for those last watches.
September 23, 2007, 19:51
David AbbeI took this thing down to the bones, and when it became clear there were only 4-1/2 pairs of Jewels I was very careful to re-certify that all parts including the top plate have matching s/n's.
Also, the main pivot on the plate has not been reworked, filled or re-bushed, it is just a hole instead of being Jeweled.
September 23, 2007, 20:53
Peter S. BalkanI guess, at some point, we have to consider the possibility that Waltham made a mistake.... or lied!

September 29, 2007, 16:21
Norman BlissDavid, from the pictures, I make the serial no. to be 15009204. The Waltham database returns a listing for Model 1883, grade no. 85, 17j, Adjusted, no year. VERY interesting watch.
Norman
September 29, 2007, 17:34
David AbbeIt is my "Guess" that a 15 Jewel top plate was kicked in to finish a watch that was otherwise OK, but with a spoiled plate.
As the novelty of the watch is the dial, which I hold to be equally rare as the novelty of the short jewel count, I will hang on to it as a factory "frankenwatch".
September 29, 2007, 18:03
John PavlikDavid,
These dials are not too hard to find, but I'll keep mine also.....