Internet Horology Club 185
Waltham Colonial Watch Size

This topic can be found at:
https://ihc185.infopop.cc/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/1086047761/m/5716015792

April 20, 2003, 10:18
Wayne C. Anderson
Waltham Colonial Watch Size
Have a small Waltham pocket watch, S/N 30504734, marked on the movement Waltham Premier Colonial, setting P S, and the pillar plate measures 39.60mm approx. The Ehrhardt Waltham pocket watch guide list the size as COL, was wondering why they might have used this size designation? Also wonder what the letters P S indicate in the setting? Thanks for any information.
April 20, 2003, 10:56
Ed Ueberall
Wayne,
The Waltham Colonial series movements will not fit into a standard 12 size case. The "Col" designation alerts collectors that a special case sized for these movements is required. The "PS" indicates that the movement is pendant set, as opposed to lever, pin or nail set.

Ed Ueberall
NAWCC #49688
IHC #34
April 20, 2003, 12:31
Wayne C. Anderson
Photo of the Waltham. I thought it was unusal to have Nine Jewels.


April 20, 2003, 13:32
Lindell V. Riddle
Ed, you sure are right when you say...

"The Waltham Colonial series movements will not fit into a standard 12 size case"

Why that rascal measures EIGHT INCHES IN DIAMETER on my screen! Talk about your "OVERSIZE" 12-sizes!

But seriously I'm pleased to see these heretofore underrated 12-size watches being discussed in our forums. For the last couple years I've been increasingly interested in the various 12-size watches and I see them as the next wave of Horological Collectibles.

As an example barely two years ago I bought a Hamilton Masterpiece in an 18K stiff-bow case for under a thousand dollars. Try that today!

There are a lot of really great 12-size watches with all the quality and prestige of their bigger brothers, and then some!


Lindell

Wink
April 20, 2003, 14:25
Wayne C. Anderson
I have one Waltham Colonial with a metal dial, and the second one (S/N 30482354) was found with an enamal dial - wonder what type is correct for Nine Jewel, Grade No. 209 N.S.?

Dial

April 20, 2003, 15:02
Lindell V. Riddle
I would defer judgement to Ed or a Waltham expert, but my belief is that any dial that would have been available at the time of manufacture and fit the movement could have originally come on your watch.

That's the criteria that I have been using. When in doubt my source is period advertising and other such materials.

With a leaning to porcelain of course!

Lindell

Wink
April 20, 2003, 15:55
Jerry Treiman
Wayne, your watch is fairly late and would have had a metal dial. It is a 1924 model Colonial, also known as a Colonial B. The enamel dial you show looks like one for the Colonial Series watches (different model) and would probably not fit your movement (the dial feet might be OK but the diameter would be wrong). [On the other hand, you might have a standard 12-size enamel dial there, which might fit but would not be appropriate.]

I would be happy to answer any other questions on these watches.
April 20, 2003, 19:33
John Arrowood
I think the 9-jewel movements are not that uncommon, my Dad and Granddad each bought one in the 1938-1940 era, by mail order from Spiegel or Montgomery Ward, 16-size pockets in base metal cases. I also have a 9-jewel Waltham wrist watch. The wristie is marked Waltham Premier 750, nine jewels.