Internet Horology Club 185
CEH & Co. Case?? Howard??

This topic can be found at:
https://ihc185.infopop.cc/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/1086047761/m/2661049522

January 06, 2007, 12:39
Robert V. Jones
CEH & Co. Case?? Howard??
Who made the CEH Co. Cases were they strickly for Howards? Also are all Keywind E Howards Key Set from the back?? Thanks


tymekeeper005
January 06, 2007, 14:30
Dr. Clint Geller
Hi Bob,

Yes, all keywind Howards are both wound and set from the rear. This is one of several reasons why they require special cases. "C.E.H.&Co." stood for "Charles E. Hale & Company." "CEH&Co." cases are most often found housing Model 1858 Type D and Type E (Series II) and very early (S# < 6,000) Model 1862 (Series III) Howard movements, or contemporary Waltham movements (M57, M59, M60-62). Crossman informs us that Chas. E. Hale & Co. was "succeeded in business" in the early 1860's by Wheeler, Parsons & Co., which later became Wheeler, Parsons & Hayes sometime in the 1880's. W.P. & Co. was a large jewelry wholesaler and probably never made their own cases. Hale's successor's trademark was "W.P.&Co.," but many of their cases had a separate, somewhat cryptic marking on the underside of their cuvette, which may have been the actual maker's mark.
Chas. E. Hale & Co. was most likely a similar type of business. In both instances, the Hale or W.P. & Co. private labels probably were put on cases by the actual makers at their customer's requests.

George Townsend, to whom horology owes a great debt for his life's work, unfortunately popularized the incorrect notion that all "E. H. & Co." cases were made by Hale. (He believed that the "E.H.&Co." marking started out as "C.E.H.&Co.," and in his words, "...later the 'C' was dropped..." But this doesn't make a lot of sense when closely examined. Why would the Howard company wish to mark it's cases "C.E.H.&Co.?") Townsend was probably led to this false conclusion by the purely coincidental fact that the "E.H. & Co." marking came into wide use at about the same time the Hale trademark disappeared. However, we know Hale did not make all "E.H. & Co." cases, if indeed he made any at all, for several reasons:

1. The "C.E.H. & Co." marking and the "E.H. & Co." marking were in use simultaneously.
2. The "E.H. & Co." private label trademark, usually located on the inside of the rear case lid, is often found together with the true maker's mark, located on the interior surface of the cuvette. I have seen at least 4 or 5 different maker's marks appearing together with the "E.H. & Co." private label, but I have never seen "E.H.&Co." together with either "C.E.H. & Co." or "W.P. & Co." (Indeed, as discussed above, Hale and W.P.&Co. likely did not actually make watch cases.)
3. The "E.H.&Co." marking continued in use til 1903, long after Chas. E. Hale & Co., and even W.P.&Co., had been "succeeded in business."

Clint
January 06, 2007, 15:01
Robert V. Jones
Wow Thanks a million for all the great info.


tymekeeper005