February 24, 2011, 16:46
Mike HodgeComments Welcomed 990 Hamilton
I would appreciate your take on this watch.
February 24, 2011, 16:48
Mike HodgeCase marking, numbers all match.
February 24, 2011, 16:49
Mike HodgeMovement, abit fuzzy, I am no Lindell!

The movement SN is 706821 as has been pointed out it is not legible in my photo. I'll just say the photo is fuzzy due to operator error, not because it is flawed. It is near (if not) pristine.
February 24, 2011, 18:43
Claude GriffithI have two 990's the one and two screw version and both are extremely nice watches in both looks and timekeeping. I see people pass the 990 by for 992's even though the 990 is a nicer watch and cost a bit more when made. To me these are probably some of the best looking watches that Hamilton made.
February 24, 2011, 19:10
Mike HodgeI agree Claude, the movements are spectacular! I'll take a better photo tomorrow and replace the fuzzy one. I was in a hurry. Both the 990 and 991's are probably as nice looking as any movement.
February 24, 2011, 22:22
Claude GriffithI think the 990 had gold jewel settings, poised pallet fork, chamfered regulator spring, then whatever extra fine ruby jewels vs fine ruby jewels for the 992 amounts to and less made and typically you can pick them up for less than the 992. That is why I grabbed my two.
February 25, 2011, 17:54
Mike Hodgeanother movement, still not good photo
February 25, 2011, 19:59
Mike HodgeActually I have a Ball Waltham that needs a correct case and will remove it from its current case and simply swap them. Then they will both be housed in correct cases although not original cases.
February 25, 2011, 21:42
Samie L. SmithMike nice watch i really like the 990,s i belive they are one of the nicer movement,s Hamilton made .