Internet Horology Club 185
Early Serial Number Movements? Let's See Yours!

This topic can be found at:
https://ihc185.infopop.cc/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/1086047761/m/197102803

November 14, 2014, 01:21
Ken Habeeb
Early Serial Number Movements? Let's See Yours!
Thanks. That's a statement you wouldn't be able to make about an early Waltham or Howard.


The watch below was made in Waltham, Mass. late in the year 1859. Low serial for a Model 1857, because the signed A.T.&Co. movement serial #s didn't really begin until almost number 8100.

Still, this timepiece was put together a few years after Paul Williams' Dennison, Howard & Davis.


November 14, 2014, 05:39
Ethan Lipsig
Ken, when I said that my very early Elgin had the correct dial, you replied by saying that one couldn't say that about an early Waltham or Howard. Please explain why that is the case, and please confirm that my dial, shown below, is correct. Let me know whether you think the hands are correct. If not, what hands would be correct?


November 14, 2014, 06:55
Bila Wirriganwalters
Sorry Ethan & Ken if I am butting in here, Ethan your dial is correct so are the style of hands, just have a doubt over the length of the hour hand as it looks too short. Wink

Cheers,
Bila
November 14, 2014, 09:59
Christopher Darwin
One of my favorite watches is my National Watch Co. (Elgin) #4911. I don't have a photo but it's very similar in appearance to Ethan's #820 (I'd love to own a 3-digit Elgin one day).

Judging by the serial number progression, these watches were made in the first weeks of Elgin production. At that time, Andrew Johnson was President of all 26 United States, the trans-continental railroad was two years in the future, and electric light was more than a decade away.

I wind #4911 every morning and it keeps railroad grade time.
November 14, 2014, 11:37
Ken Habeeb
Ethan -- Your dial and hands are correct. Early Elgins did have a short hour hand - tho' it might look a little funny to some eyes, Bila's and mine included.
A very few early - and correct - Walthams and E. Howards deviated from the ubiquitous Roman-numeral dial, and that is a subject of interest these days.
Cheers.
November 14, 2014, 12:03
Ethan Lipsig
Thanks, Ken. It's hard enough to be sure what's correct. It's harder still to find the right parts. Now I have one less thing to chase down.
November 15, 2014, 01:36
Bila Wirriganwalters
Thanks Ken for the info as well, this is good to know.

Cheers,
Bila
November 09, 2015, 10:30
Tony Dukes
Picked up 18s Rockford with serial number 1179 at the recent J&H auction.
Tony

Rockford---sn 1179


December 14, 2015, 01:14
Bryan Keith Richmond
My Melrose sn32386 (they start at 30,000).




Keith R...
December 20, 2015, 20:37
Eugene Buffard
Here is my lowest Serial number watch I own. Possible the very first Gruen pocket Watch. For what it is worth 62000 is the number.


December 20, 2015, 20:41
Eugene Buffard
Here is a link to this watch.

Gruen 62000